From: Victor Cappuccio (cvictor@protokolgroup.com)
Date: Mon Jan 16 2006 - 14:19:14 GMT-3
Also, I think that this scenario could be solved if you creat a BVI
interface on R6.. Think about IRB or CBR
Please excuse my 2 post I pressed the send button to fast, I'm missing
caffeine today
-----Mensaje original-----
De: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] En nombre de Victor
Cappuccio
Enviado el: lunes, 16 de enero de 2006 13:11
Para: 'Faryar Zabihi (fzabihi)'; 'Cisco certification'
Asunto: RE: same subnet different vlans
Have you thought about using fallback bridging?
-----Mensaje original-----
De: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] En nombre de Faryar
Zabihi (fzabihi)
Enviado el: lunes, 16 de enero de 2006 12:08
Para: Cisco certification
Asunto: same subnet different vlans
I have sw1 and r2 and r6 on the same Ethernet segment and same subnet
(130.1.1.0/24 vlan 35) Physically, both r2 and r6 plug into L2 ports on
sw1. r2 is in a vlan 35 port but r6 is in a vlan 6 port. I would think
that r6 needs to be plugged into a vlan 35 port on the switch or
otherwise they cant communicate. How can I get these three devices to
talk in this scenario? If all 3 devices are on the same subnet, how can
one be put in a different vlan and still have connectivity between them?
sw1 .7===130.1.1.0/24 vlan 35====.6 R6
|
|
|
.2
R2
sw1:
int fa0/3
"to R6"
switchport access vlan 6
int fa0/4
"to R2"
switchport access vlan 35
int vlan 35
ip add 130.1.1.7 255.255.255.0
Thanks for your help,
Faryar Zabihi
Cisco Systems Inc.
RTP, NC 27709
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Feb 01 2006 - 07:45:49 GMT-3