From: Vijay Ramcharan (vramcharan@totality.com)
Date: Fri Jan 13 2006 - 18:18:32 GMT-3
Brant, thanks for your reply. The MSFC2 in hybrid mode requires the boot
image, in native mode it doesn't.
I don't think there are release notes for bootldr images. If there are, I
didn't see them.
Vijay Ramcharan
-----Original Message-----
From: Brant I. Stevens [mailto:branto@branto.com]
Sent: 13 January, 2006 16:05
To: 'Vijay Ramcharan'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Bootldr image on MSFC
I'm pretty sure that the MSFC2 doesn't even require the bootloader. If you
look at the release notes for a particular version of code, you'll usually
get the details of one revision vs. another.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Vijay Ramcharan
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 1:23 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Bootldr image on MSFC
I'm having a difficult time finding any reasons why I should use one bootldr
image vs another on MSFCs.
Is there a link somewhere that explains the difference between versions?
For example, why use c6msfc2-boot-mz.121-26.E3.bin vs
c6msfc2-boot-mz.121-8b.E20.bin?
Is there any correlation between the boot image and the runtime image?
I tried Feature Navigator but that only seems to list runtime images.
Thanks
Vijay Ramcharan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Feb 01 2006 - 07:45:49 GMT-3