Bootldr image on MSFC

From: Vijay Ramcharan (vramcharan@totality.com)
Date: Fri Jan 13 2006 - 15:23:05 GMT-3

• Next message: Chris Lewis: "Re: Confuse between Sparse & Dense"
• Previous message: Schulz, Dave: "RE: Confuse between Sparse & Dense"
• Next in thread: Brant I. Stevens: "RE: Bootldr image on MSFC"
• Maybe reply: Brant I. Stevens: "RE: Bootldr image on MSFC"
• Maybe reply: Vijay Ramcharan: "RE: Bootldr image on MSFC"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I'm having a difficult time finding any reasons why I should use one bootldr
image vs another on MSFCs.

Is there a link somewhere that explains the difference between versions?
For example, why use c6msfc2-boot-mz.121-26.E3.bin vs
c6msfc2-boot-mz.121-8b.E20.bin?
Is there any correlation between the boot image and the runtime image?
 
I tried Feature Navigator but that only seems to list runtime images.
Thanks
 
Vijay Ramcharan

• Next message: Chris Lewis: "Re: Confuse between Sparse & Dense"
• Previous message: Schulz, Dave: "RE: Confuse between Sparse & Dense"
• Next in thread: Brant I. Stevens: "RE: Bootldr image on MSFC"
• Maybe reply: Brant I. Stevens: "RE: Bootldr image on MSFC"
• Maybe reply: Vijay Ramcharan: "RE: Bootldr image on MSFC"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Feb 01 2006 - 07:45:49 GMT-3