From: Chris Lewis (chrlewiscsco@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Dec 16 2005 - 23:15:40 GMT-3
I'd say neither.
The question is whether you want the 50K allowed for 239.39.39.39 to count
against the 100K allowance for all multicast groups or not.
This looks more like an MQC question with police. If the former, create an
access list for 239.39.39.39 and an access for all multicast, then nest a
plicy to limit the 239 group to 50K within the policy for all multicast to
100k.
If the latter, create an ACL for the 239 broup, then a separate access list
for all multicast except that group and police both of them accordingly.
Chris
On 12/16/05, Chad Hintz <ccie_2b2004@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Have a question on the way to rate limit traffic from one group lets say
> 239.39.39.39 to 50k and all other multicast groups to 100k. How would I
> accomplish this on a router's interface?
>
> ip multicast rate-limit?
> or rate-limit access-group?
>
> TIA
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jan 09 2006 - 07:07:51 GMT-3