From: James Matrisciano (jmatrisciano@kenttech.com)
Date: Fri Dec 09 2005 - 19:12:30 GMT-3
You need to watch out for your restrictions on the 0.0.0.0 mask. If you
have a restriction that all interfaces must be advertised with their
original mask, make sure you do not use the 0.0.0.0 unless you are
allowed to use the ip ospf network point-to-point command under the
interface you are conneting with. Again, this will fall under the
restrictions of how you can have your ospf neighbors talk to each other.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Melwani, Manoj J
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 4:45 PM
To: Kim Judy; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Wildcard issue
The best practice is to use the second method. By using 0.0.0.0 wildcard
you are saying that I want to run OSPF routing process just on that
particular interface unless if you have a whole range of interface that
you want to use on the same line then you might want to use the first
method.
Yes Its a good idea to use router-id under the routing process. Use
Loopback 0 as your router id's.
Thanks,
Manoj.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Kim Judy
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 4:15 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Wildcard issue
hi group,
I have a query that if a interface has an Ip address 172.16.12.1/25 What
wild card bits should I use under the IGP process ?
router ospf 1
net 172.16.12.1 0.0.0.127 or
net 172.16.12.1 0.0.0.0
which is the best way ? What does Cisco expect from us ?
If not specified should I use a "router-id" under each IGP running on a
router ?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jan 09 2006 - 07:07:50 GMT-3