RE: Wildcard issue

From: HIERS, DAVID \(AIT\) (dh4578@sbc.com)
Date: Fri Dec 09 2005 - 18:30:43 GMT-3

• Next message: Melwani, Manoj J: "RE: Wildcard issue"
• Previous message: Schulz, Dave: "RE: Wildcard issue"
• Maybe in reply to: Kim Judy: "Wildcard issue"
• Next in thread: Melwani, Manoj J: "RE: Wildcard issue"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I'm a control-freak:

net 172.16.12.1 0.0.0.0

David Hiers

CCIE 10734, CISSP
Systems Engineer
AT&T AESE
-###-

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Kim Judy
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 1:15 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Wildcard issue

hi group,
I have a query that if a interface has an Ip address 172.16.12.1/25
What wild card bits should I use under the IGP process ?

router ospf 1
net 172.16.12.1 0.0.0.127 or
net 172.16.12.1 0.0.0.0

which is the best way ? What does Cisco expect from us ?

If not specified should I use a "router-id" under each IGP running on a
router ?

• Next message: Melwani, Manoj J: "RE: Wildcard issue"
• Previous message: Schulz, Dave: "RE: Wildcard issue"
• Maybe in reply to: Kim Judy: "Wildcard issue"
• Next in thread: Melwani, Manoj J: "RE: Wildcard issue"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jan 09 2006 - 07:07:50 GMT-3