From: Venkataramanaiah.R (vramanaiah@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Dec 04 2005 - 08:26:37 GMT-3
Well, just a basic question.. Is it a bad thing to include the loopback in
more than one protocol..(assuming there is no explicit restriction to not
include in any one of the protocol)? My idea is to make them look native in
both the protocols..
Thoughts..?
-Venkat
On 12/3/05, Hash Aminu <hashng@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> gramatical was too much in the lab having been there myself too . and
> concerning the left off of an interface not being covered by a routing
> protocol i doubt much. EXCEPT if cisco has given you an open choice for
> that
> which usually use to be of no consequence, and sometimes as a gotcha.
> base configs mistakes AFAIK the proctor will notify you that if you have
> any of that its your duty to correct it. that is settled. as you have
> pointed out yourself.
> BUT wording of the question i believe have been carefully checked by
> cisco.
> anyway this is my opinion i stand to be corrected
> thanks alot
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jan 09 2006 - 07:07:50 GMT-3