Re: iBGP

From: Anthony Sequeira (terry.francona@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Dec 02 2005 - 15:06:49 GMT-3


Ahh yes - BGP is not running in the transit path of your AS - so it is a
BLACK HOLE when it comes to reaching BGP learned prefixes.

Perhaps the group will help me list ALL of the possible solutions here....I
will get us started:

1. Static routes on R2
2. Run BGP on R2
3. Default route on R2
4. Redistribute the BGP routes into the underlying IGP
5. Tunnel BGP across R2 using GRE
6. ????
7. ????

On 12/2/05, Des <ongdes@singnet.com.sg> wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> I have the following scenerios.
>
>
> R1(AS100)------R2(non-bgp)-----R3(AS100)
>
> I am peering with R3 with ibgp. I can receive all the routes from R1.
> But however, I cannot ping R1 advertised networks. I need to have a
> static route at R2 for those network advertised by R1. Is there any way
> without adding static routes?
>
> Tks!
>
> Des
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jan 09 2006 - 07:07:50 GMT-3