Re: iBGP

From: joshua lauer (jslauer@hotmail.com)
Date: Fri Dec 02 2005 - 15:08:15 GMT-3


Try policy routing in the middle or creating a GRE tunnel since R2 is not
running BGP.

JL

----- Original Message -----
From: "Des" <ongdes@singnet.com.sg>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 12:57 PM
Subject: iBGP

> Hi there,
>
> I have the following scenerios.
>
>
> R1(AS100)------R2(non-bgp)-----R3(AS100)
>
> I am peering with R3 with ibgp. I can receive all the routes from R1.
> But however, I cannot ping R1 advertised networks. I need to have a
> static route at R2 for those network advertised by R1. Is there any way
> without adding static routes?
>
> Tks!
>
> Des
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jan 09 2006 - 07:07:50 GMT-3