Re: Question on using Authentication over Virtual Links

From: Thomwin Chen (thomwin_chen@yahoo.com)
Date: Mon Nov 28 2005 - 21:58:07 GMT-3

• Next message: Big guy: "SV: hold down a route"
• Previous message: Emir trhulj: "FREEK and FRTS on the same interface ?"
• Maybe in reply to: steven richards: "Question on using Authentication over Virtual Links"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi Steven,
   
  I just found this good link, but I think labbing what is written in this link will make it perfect.
   
  http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/technologies_configuration_example09186a00800946bd.shtml
   
  

steven richards <ccie_2005@hotmail.com> wrote:
  hello,

a virtual link is an extension to area 0. So if I had three routers that
where in a hub and spoke network that where connected via area 10. And one
of the spokes was connected to area 0. And I where using clear text in area
0 and message digest in area 10. I believe I would need to use clear text
auth over the virtual link since it is an extension to area 0 even though it
is physically connected to routers that are using message digest to connect
to each other. Is this a correct assumption ?

Thanks,

• Next message: Big guy: "SV: hold down a route"
• Previous message: Emir trhulj: "FREEK and FRTS on the same interface ?"
• Maybe in reply to: steven richards: "Question on using Authentication over Virtual Links"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 01 2005 - 09:12:08 GMT-3