From: Schulz, Dave (DSchulz@dpsciences.com)
Date: Mon Nov 28 2005 - 01:59:25 GMT-3
Also, keep in mind (as the your original question) mentioning rip...that rip
does not form adjacencies as eigrp does.
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com
To: 'Primetek_Easyman'; 'GroupStudy CCIE-Lab'
Sent: 11/27/2005 8:23 PM
Subject: RE: Eigrp Secondary address question ?
You can form the relationship, but then your neighbors will complain
about
"Neighbor not on common subnet" and ignore any routes.
Fix the IPs!
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Primetek_Easyman
Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2005 8:02 PM
To: GroupStudy CCIE-Lab
Subject: Eigrp Secondary address question ?
Dear Group Study gurus:
I have a question about secondary address issue in eigrp.
Is it possible to forming adjacency from different primary network
addresses
on two routers?
This is an imaginary scenario.
Say two routers -- R1 and R2
R1(e0/0) -----------------(e0/0)R2
R1
Interface e0/0
Ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
Ip address 1.1.2.1 255.255.255.0 secondary Router eigrp 1 Network
1.0.0.0
R2
Interface e0/0
Ip address 1.1.2.2 255.255.255.0
Router eigrp 1
Network 1.0.0.0
In rip world we have an option called "no validate-update-source" to
conquer
this restriction.
But after searching the CCO I could not find the equivalent as above in
eigrp world.
Can we still have the adjacency forming up without change the primary or
secondary address?
Thanks
Lin
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 01 2005 - 09:12:08 GMT-3