From: Ed Lui (edwlui@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Nov 25 2005 - 21:19:18 GMT-3
Anderson,
It can also be done by using offset-list, distribut-list, and
access-list to achieve the goal.
Ed Lui
On 11/25/05, Anderson Nery Vilas Boas <andervb@yahoo.dk> wrote:
> That is the question:
>
> -r1 cannot receive or send uptates to r2 expect on frame -relay
> link"
> the problem is , to not send is easy , just passive interface. But how make
> the other interfaces do not receive if all networks are include in rip
> process by the net command?
>
> Ed Lui <edwlui@gmail.com> skrev:
> Pete,
>
> No sure if I understand the question correctly. I think the question
> is " -r1 cannot receive or send uptates to r2 expect on frame -relay
> link"
>
> He did not mention if the interface needs to be included in the
> routing protocol. Anyway, I would use passive interface and md5
> authentication if it is rip 2.
>
> Would that work ?
>
> Ed Lui
>
> On 11/25/05, Peter McCreesh wrote:
> > Hi Ed,
> > you could use the neighbor command to determine what interface is used and
> > make all interfaces passive including the FR. This will mean all updates
> are
> > unicast between the neighbors and the passive interface will ensure that
> no
> > broadcasts are sent.
> >
> > HTH,
> >
> > Pete
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 01 2005 - 09:12:07 GMT-3