From: Grabler, Ross \(IT\) (Ross.Grabler@morganstanley.com)
Date: Fri Nov 25 2005 - 19:40:41 GMT-3
Try this, I tried this a while ago and if I remember correctly it
worked.
Router rip
distribute-list prefix routes gateway not_router2 in
Make a prefix list not_router2 and don't include router2,
Make a prefix list to permit all call it routes.
Ip prefix-list 0.0.0.0/0 le 32 (I think this is how you permit all)
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Anderson Nery Vilas Boas
Sent: Friday, November 25, 2005 5:27 PM
To: Ed Lui; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: SV: Re: Re: RIP secrets
That is the question:
-r1 cannot receive or send uptates to r2 expect on frame -relay link"
the problem is , to not send is easy , just passive interface. But how
make the other interfaces do not receive if all networks are include in
rip process by the net command?
Ed Lui <edwlui@gmail.com> skrev:
Pete,
No sure if I understand the question correctly. I think the question is
" -r1 cannot receive or send uptates to r2 expect on frame -relay link"
He did not mention if the interface needs to be included in the routing
protocol. Anyway, I would use passive interface and md5 authentication
if it is rip 2.
Would that work ?
Ed Lui
On 11/25/05, Peter McCreesh
wrote:
> Hi Ed,
> you could use the neighbor command to determine what interface is used
> and make all interfaces passive including the FR. This will mean all
> updates are unicast between the neighbors and the passive interface
> will ensure that no broadcasts are sent.
>
> HTH,
>
> Pete
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 01 2005 - 09:12:07 GMT-3