From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Fri Nov 25 2005 - 11:03:39 GMT-3
I think Steven wants to go the other way (for some weird reason)...
So, following the logic a router may have... How about keep OSPF at its
normal state (which will bring any loopbacks in as /32) and then
redistribute them into the other routing protocols? What do things look
like then?
There's not any other way in EIGRP to advertise a partial mask like that.
I've never tried doing a summary-address in that direction, but I can't
imagine it would work (that would be bad programming logic IMHO).
So outside of the "Why would you want to do this anyway?" question, just
break down the basic points that we know the router thinks of and put them
toghether to make it work!
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
PANDI MOORTHY
Sent: Friday, November 25, 2005 4:45 AM
To: steven richards
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Changing lookback addresses from /24's to 32's
I think by default OSPF behave like this, you may need to add the command
"ip ospf network point-to-point" under interface Loopack to ensure the
network is not advertised as a host route to the OSPF domain
Pandi
On 11/25/05, steven richards <ccie_2005@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> In OSPF when you add a loopback address into the routing protocol it
> is seen as a /32. I have noticed when adding a loopback address in
> EIGRP and RIP it is seen as a /24. Is there a way besides changing the
> subnet mask to change the route from a /24 to a /32 ?
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE!
>
> http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _ Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 01 2005 - 09:12:07 GMT-3