From: Lee Donald (Lee.Donald@t-systems.co.uk)
Date: Wed Nov 23 2005 - 04:13:03 GMT-3
Steve,
First of all rate-limiting is Policing!!
There are 2 forms of policing at the moment, one is CAR and the other is
class based policing. CAR is the legacy function and something in your
question would lead you to one rather than the other.
CAR is applied on the interface and policing is used within a Policy map
with a class.
HTH
Lee
-----Original Message-----
From: Skinner, Stephen [mailto:Stephen.Skinner@rbs.co.uk]
Sent: 22 November 2005 17:53
To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: Rate-limit v police command
hello
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fqos
_c/fqcprt4/qcfpolsh.htm#wp1000920
I have read through the above doc several times and I have failed to find
the answer I need
CAR committed access rate , from what I can see , this is just a
description of what policing, rate-limiting and shaping do ,they all give a
CAR
I understand why I would use policing instead of shaping , and what the
difference is ,that makes sense to me.
but
rate-limit V police , Why would I use on over the other , when I do a
feature check they ( to me) seem to do the same thing .
so in the lab what do you believe would point you towards Rate-limit and
away from police .
if this has been discussed in a previous post please let me know , as I have
been unable to find it in the archives
many thanks
Steve
The Royal Bank of Scotland plc, Registered in Scotland No. 90312. Registered
Office: 36 St Andrew Square, Edinburgh EH2 2YB
Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority.
This e-mail message is confidential and for use by the addressee only. If
the message is received by anyone other than the addressee, please return
the message to the sender by replying to it and then delete the message from
your computer. Internet e-mails are not necessarily secure. The Royal Bank
of Scotland plc does not accept responsibility for changes made to this
message after it was sent.
Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission of
viruses, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that the onward
transmission, opening or use of this message and any attachments will not
adversely affect its systems or data. No responsibility is accepted by The
Royal Bank of Scotland plc in this regard and the recipient should carry out
such virus and other checks as it considers appropriate.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 01 2005 - 09:12:07 GMT-3