From: ticong@comcast.net
Date: Tue Nov 22 2005 - 15:28:39 GMT-3
run debug ip packet after your config and see what happen on your igp configuration, and if you suspect routing problem during lab run debug ip routing.
-------------- Original message --------------
> Ok,
>
> Getting ready to go back again and pass this time, but now I find that
> I am reading into the questions in some areas. maybe some of you that
> have passed this great hurdle can shed some light on those of us that
> feel that their brains are about to pop.
>
> Lets say you are told to:
> RIP
> exchange updates only on links specified (between R2 and R3 and R4)
>
> Now, you could do this with a passive interface and a no passive
> interface on the interfaces that need to participate in the RIP updates,
> you could also do this with neighbor commands, eliminating the broadcast
> address in your rip updates.
>
> Now, nothing said it HAD to be unicast, or to NOT use a unicast address,
> but would it be wrong?
>
> Same goes for EIGRP
>
> Use a neighbor command or just specify a subnet mask at the end of the
> network statement?
>
>
> Frame Relay.
>
> As a best practice, I pretty much always use the broadcast statement at
> the end of a frame map ip command. But what about the local interface.
> If it does not say that it must ping itself, should you do it any way?
> Are they (the sadistic individuals that write and grade these tests from
> Hades) going to look at your sh frame map commands and determine that
> you should only have two map statements in your router and dock you for
> having three (multipoint interface connected to two other routers via
> map statements)?
>
> Like I said, I am at the point to where I am reading into the questions
> and guidelines (or lack there of). I know, ask the proctor, but it has
> been my experience that the proctor doesn't always know what the end
> result will be from the proctor out in Australia that is going to grade
> my masterpiece. I know that to pass this you must know how to configure
> everything about 5 different ways, I am at that point, but now I am just
> concerned that one of the ways that I choose (even though it doesn't
> effect the rest of the topology) may be incorrect.
>
> Any incite, words of wisdom and just "this is what my buddy did"
> comments are most welcome
>
>
> jm
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 01 2005 - 09:12:07 GMT-3