From: Mitchell, TJ (tmitchell@allianttech.com)
Date: Tue Nov 15 2005 - 15:52:10 GMT-3
Correct, It will be redundant to point how the hosts deal with the
second gateway.
You send out 2 gateways, first one is preferred, second is less
preferred, and so on down the line.
Now, how the hosts deal with is a totally different animal.
Thanks
T.J. Mitchell
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Skinner, Stephen
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 12:50 PM
To: 'dusth@comcast.net'
Cc: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: RE: DHCP and multiple default gateway possible
yes i believe that if you specify two gateways it will not load balance
but
it will be redundent
HTH
Stephen Skinner
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [SMTP:nobody@groupstudy.com]
> Sent: 14 November 2005 03:39
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: DHCP and multiple default gateway possible
>
> *** WARNING : This message originates from the Internet ***
>
> -------------- Original message --------------
>
> Hi Group,
> Has anyone tested dhcp configuration with multiple default gateway
> configuration assisgn to client? Seem like Cisco router DHCP
configuration
> supports for multiple default gateway assign to client but I'm not
sure if
> this is might be a desire solution for default gateway redundancy in
case
> the primary gateway is down, then the secondary will pickup the job.
>
> !
> ip dhcp pool abc
> network 172.16.0.0 255.255.255.0
> default-router 172.16.1.1 172.16.1.2
> dns-server 172.16.1.1
> !
> Thanks, Dustin
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 01 2005 - 09:12:06 GMT-3