From: Mitchell, TJ (tmitchell@allianttech.com)
Date: Mon Nov 14 2005 - 12:12:24 GMT-3
I have used the command in this exact scenario before so I know it
works.
Thanks
T.J. Mitchell
-----Original Message-----
From: Skinner, Stephen [mailto:Stephen.Skinner@rbs.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 10:11 AM
To: 'manoj menon'; 'Chris Lewis'; Mitchell, TJ; 'Arun Arumuganainar';
'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: RE: IE Lab Exercise
TJ , chris, manoj
i have just seen this in the CCO about the command "frame-relay
interface-dlci"
This command is typically used for subinterfaces; however, it can also
be
used on main interfaces. Using the frame-relay interface-dlci command on
main interfaces will enable the use of routing protocols on interfaces
that
use Inverse ARP.
from what i have seen here i appologise for my previous comment`s ,
regards
Stephen Skinner
> -----Original Message-----
> From: manoj menon [SMTP:manojmenon123@yahoo.com]
> Sent: 14 November 2005 15:08
> To: Skinner, Stephen; 'Chris Lewis'; 'Mitchell, TJ'; 'Arun
> Arumuganainar'; 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> Subject: RE: IE Lab Exercise
>
> *** WARNING : This message originates from the Internet ***
>
>
> Mitchel, Stephen,,
>
> Even on the spokes, just assigning frame-rely interface-dlci will not
help
> any mapping, you got to either turn on 'inverse-arp' or state
'frame-relay
> map' for that dlci....unless you use it under a point-to-point
> sub-interface - off-course, no mapping is required on a p2p
interface.
>
> Regards
> Manoj
>
>
>
> "Skinner, Stephen" <Stephen.Skinner@rbs.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Also i forgot to say ,
>
> i have been taught that using the fram-relay interface-dlci
command
> assign
> all outbound frames to that DLCI , therefore you have your
mapping ,
>
>
> althought i am beginning to doubt this
>
> steve
>
>
> Stephen Skinner
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Skinner, Stephen
> > Sent: 14 November 2005 15:00
> > To: 'Chris Lewis'; Mitchell, TJ; Arun Arumuganainar;
> > ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: RE: IE Lab Exercise
> >
> > chris,
> >
> > i have always been told as best practise ,
> >
> > if you want to specify a DLCI without using static mapping you
> should use
> > the last command ,
> >
> >
> > i forgot to say that this is for a spoke and not the hub ,
> >
> > i am thinking on the lab , i could leave it out and as you say
,it
> would
> > work , but it would not demonstrate my knowledge of the
subject
> and i
> > believe you would be marked down for that
> >
> > i should have also really added the point-to-multipoint line
to
> the int
> > s0/0
> >
> > P.S
> > i forgot to say that this is for a spoke and not the hub ,
> >
> > cheers
> >
> > Stephen Skinner
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chris Lewis [SMTP:chrlewiscsco@yahoo.com]
> > Sent: 14 November 2005 14:45
> > To: Mitchell, TJ; Skinner, Stephen; Arun Arumuganainar;
> > ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: RE: IE Lab Exercise
> >
> > *** WARNING : This message originates from the Internet ***
> >
> >
> > I'm sorry TJ, I'm not sure I follow:
> >
> > The config supplied (it did not say for which router) was as
> > follows:
> >
> > int s0/0
> > encap frame-relay
> > no frame-relay inverse-arp
> > ip address 1.1.1.X 255.255.255.252
> > frame-relay interface-dlci 40X
> >
> > What I was trying to point out was the following:
> >
> > 1. All DLCIs are by default assigned to the physical
interface, so
> > the last command here adds nothing over and above what teh
router
> would do
> > if it were not there.
> > 2. with no fram-relay inverse-arp and no manual map
statements,
> > there are no L3 to L2 mappings, so no packets will be sent out
> that
> > interface.
> >
> > You seem to be thinking that turning off inverse-arp will not
> allow
> > the router to assign a DLCI to an interface. This is
incorrect.
> > inverse-arp is about mapping a layer 3 destination to a local
> layer 2
> > address.
> >
> > "Mitchell, TJ" wrote:
> >
> > Chris --
> > R3 is going to use the Frame-relay map command under the
> > physical
> > interface.
> > Next the configuration that was provided for the spokes (by
> > Stephen)
> > will work fine, since you disabled inverse arp on the spokes
> > the DLCI's
> > need to be specified.
> >
> > Using that configuration doesn't configure L3 - L2 mapping
> > on the
> > physical interface for the spokes.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > T.J. Mitchell
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]
> > On Behalf Of
> > Chris Lewis
> > Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 9:10 AM
> > To: Skinner, Stephen; 'Arun Arumuganainar';
> > ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: RE: IE Lab Exercise
> >
> > Stephen,
> >
> > I don't see how this would help. All DLCI's are assigned to
> > the physical
> > interface by default, so assigning the DLCI with that
> > command here does
> > nothing. Also this is a multipoint interface, so without
> > some layer 3 to
> > layer 2 mapping, no packets are going anywhere.
> >
> > Arun, I believe the IE lab solution guide gives a working
> > config, can't
> > you look at that? From memory I think the OSPF section gives
> > a clue as
> > to how spoke to spoke connectivity is achieved. On the hub
> > you can still
> > use map statements.
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > "Skinner, Stephen" wrote:
> > int s0/0
> > encap frame-relay
> > no frame-relay inverse-arp
> > ip address 1.1.1.X 255.255.255.252
> > frame-relay interface-dlci 40X
> >
> > HTH
> >
> > Stephen Skinner
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [SMTP:nobody@groupstudy.com]
> > > Sent: 14 November 2005 11:17
> > > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > Subject: IE Lab Exercise
> > >
> > > *** WARNING : This message originates from the Internet
> > ***
> > >
> > > Here are conditions .
> > >
> > > 1) Topology HUB and SPOKE . R3=> Hub R4 and R5 => Spoke .
> > > 2) Use only Physical interfaces on all the 3 routers
> > > 3) Do not use Dynamic mapping ( No Inverse ARP )
> > > 4) Do not configure static Layer 3 to Layer 2 Mapping on
> > spokes
> > >
> > > Just wondering How to configure this ?. Any body can throw
> > some light
> > on
> > > it .
> > > It would be great !!!
> > >
> > > Thanks and Regards
> > > Arun
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 01 2005 - 09:12:06 GMT-3