From: Arun Arumuganainar (aarumuga@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Nov 14 2005 - 11:06:39 GMT-3
I misread the question !!!
Question reads ...No Static mapping between the spokes . I mistook it as no
static mapping on the spokes .
Really sorry for sending a dum question and confusing you guys a lot . I
need to work more on my reading skills now .
Thanks and Regards
Arun
----- Original Message -----
From: "manoj menon" <manojmenon123@yahoo.com>
To: "Arun Arumuganainar" <aarumuga@hotmail.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 6:36 PM
Subject: Re: IE Lab Exercise
> Arun,
>
> Which IELab is this one??
>
> From the given restrcitions, you can still enable static mapping from the
hub to the spokes -
> Are you sure you are stopped to used static mapping ON the spokes or may
be it is BETWEEN the spokes? So that u can still use the mapping from the
spoke to hub?
>
> Alternatively you can think of PPPoverFR (I can't remember me doing
this..but i think that should work)
>
> Regards,
> Manoj
>
> Arun Arumuganainar <aarumuga@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Here are conditions .
>
> 1) Topology HUB and SPOKE . R3=> Hub R4 and R5 => Spoke .
> 2) Use only Physical interfaces on all the 3 routers
> 3) Do not use Dynamic mapping ( No Inverse ARP )
> 4) Do not configure static Layer 3 to Layer 2 Mapping on spokes
>
> Just wondering How to configure this ?. Any body can throw some light on
it .
> It would be great !!!
>
> Thanks and Regards
> Arun
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! FareChase - Search multiple travel sites in one click.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 01 2005 - 09:12:06 GMT-3