SV: SV: fram-de bit

From: JP (jenseike@start.no)
Date: Thu Nov 10 2005 - 12:06:16 GMT-3

Next message: Scott Morris: "RE: Trouble configuring RSPAN"
Previous message: Javier Tomé: "Yes, it is possible even on your first try..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Man... I did not understand squat of what you tried to say here...

-----Opprinnelig melding-----
Fra: Nawaz, Ajaz [mailto:Ajaz.Nawaz@bskyb.com]
Sendt: 10. november 2005 12:09
Til: 'manoj menon'; JP; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Emne: RE: SV: fram-de bit

Option 1 DE List

Option 2 Set action in policy map

Option 3 Police action

Three choices. Imho the one to opt for would be the least command intensive
if the requirement is simply to set the de bit. Keep it simple - that's the
consensus right?

Ajaz Nawaz

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
manoj menon
Sent: 10 November 2005 09:08
To: JP; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: SV: fram-de bit

JP, Yes thats what I would do......to me..its more scalable...hope you
agree!

JP <jenseike@start.no> wrote:v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}o\:*
{behavior:url(#default#VML);}w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}.shape
{behavior:url(#default#VML);}
So you mean that I should do it like this :

class-map match-all fr-de

match access-group 199

policy-map FR-DE

class fr-de

set fr-de

interface Serial0/0

ip address 7.7.12.2 255.255.255.0

encapsulation frame-relay

ip ospf network point-to-multipoint

no fair-queue

frame-relay class FR-DE

frame-relay traffic-shaping

frame-relay map ip 7.7.12.3 203 broadcast

frame-relay map ip 7.7.12.5 205 broadcast

frame-relay map ip 7.7.12.6 206 broadcast

no frame-relay inverse-arp

frame-relay lmi-type ansi

map-class frame-relay FR-DE

service-policy output FR-DE

Jens P

---------------------------------

Fra: manoj menon [mailto:manojmenon123@yahoo.com]
Sendt: 10. november 2005 09:41
Til: JP; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Emne: Re: fram-de bit

hello Jens,

Shall we call the first way a 'legacy' way of doing and second one is
'advanced' or 'modular' way of doing it !!

So In the exam, i would tempt to use the latter one (unless they
specifically ask us to use FR-DE or NOT TO USE MQC)

(I have a comment on the way you applied it to the interface, i shall create
a map-class put the service-poliy under the map-class and then put it there
(if no restrictions on any of these, again)

comments please.

Regards,

manoj

JP <jenseike@start.no> wrote:

Hi group.

I am trying to sett he fr-de bit

Will this two command do the exact same thing, is there any situations one
way are the right way than the other? :

frame-relay de-list 1 protocol ip list 199

interface s0/0

frame-relay de-group 1 203

frame-relay de-group 1 205

frame-relay de-group 1 206