From: kevin gannon (kevin@gannons.net)
Date: Mon Nov 07 2005 - 12:19:27 GMT-3
Maybe the switch in between is rewriting the COS ...
Just a thought.
Regards
Kevin
On 11/6/05, Schulz, Dave <DSchulz@dpsciences.com> wrote:
> Daniel -
>
> I have tried something similar to this and it appears that there is
> something related to the matching of traffic on the interface
> (physical).....is seems (I don't know why) the router is not able to
> take the traffic and assign everything (all packets) to a specific
> precedence. It maybe related to what layer the policies are trying the
> aggregate and disperse the traffic. Maybe one of the experts on GS can
> explain this better.
>
>
> Dave Schulz,
> Email: dschulz@dpsciences.com
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Daniel Berlinski
> Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2005 6:29 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: PBR and marking precedence 3
>
> Hi Groupstudy
>
> I'm trying to PBR traffic and set ip precedence 3 for all packets
> matched in the following configs:
>
> route-map PBR permit 10
> match interface FastEthernet0/1
> set ip precedence flash
> set ip next-hop 136.1.245.2
> !
>
>
> interface FastEthernet0/1
> ip address 136.1.57.5 255.255.255.0
> ip policy route-map PBR
> duplex auto
> speed auto
>
> interface Serial0/0.245 multipoint
> ip address 136.1.245.5 255.255.255.0
> ip ospf message-digest-key 1 md5 CISCO
> ip ospf network point-to-multipoint
> ip ospf hello-interval 5
> frame-relay map ip 136.1.245.2 502 broadcast
> frame-relay map ip 136.1.245.4 504 broadcast
>
>
> debug ip policy output shows that intended traffic is being PBRouted but
> on the other end the show interface precedence command does not
> increment precedence 3 matches. (I have enabled ip accounting
> precedence input on the next-hop router)
>
> Have I messed up with something related to the order of operations? Is
> this the correct way of doing it?
> Thanks a lot
>
> This communication, including any attachments, is confidential. If you
> are not the intended recipient, you should not read it - please contact
> me immediately, destroy it, and do not copy or use any part of this
> communication or disclose anything about it. Thank you. Please note that
> this communication does not designate an information system for the
> purposes of the Electronic Transactions Act 2002.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 01 2005 - 09:12:05 GMT-3