From: Schulz, Dave (DSchulz@dpsciences.com)
Date: Sun Nov 06 2005 - 13:38:06 GMT-3
I'll add some more information on the arp frame question that Brian McGahan
sent earlier on this issue (I saved it due to my short memory, and, I couldn't
have said it better). Thanks, Brian.....(I hope you don't mind my
"reprint").....
From Brian....
The "no arp frame-relay" command has no effect on Frame Relay
Inverse-ARP. The "no frame-relay inverse-arp" command stops the router
from requesting Inverse-ARP of the remote end. It does not stop the
router from replying to inverse-arp.
Configure this simple test on the command line and see what
happens:
R1--DLCI 102--Frame_Cloud--DLCI 201--R2
R1:
interface Serial0
ip address 10.0.0.1 255.0.0.0
encapsulation frame-relay
R2:
interface Serial0
ip address 10.0.0.1 255.0.0.0
encapsulation frame-relay
no frame-relay inverse-arp
Check connectivity along with the "show frame-relay map" output.
What do you see and why?
HTH,
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com
To: 'Desmond Ong'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Sent: 11/6/2005 11:09 AM
Subject: RE: Workbooks practice doubts
1. If you want to restrict things, you should do it for all your vty
ports.
Most people think of 0-4, because those have always been the "defaults"
for
a long, long time.
2. Not necessary. Some people do to make themselves feel better
though.
3. What methods are available for you to use? ;)
4. The ilmi-keepalive part seems to be a command that magically pops up
on
some IOS versions/routers, but it isn't a part of the inarp process
AFAIK
5. You'd have to answer that based on what your scenario/topology is to
figure out what's best. Have you labbed it to see what does or doesn't
happen?
6. Who is doing the dialing? If both sides can initiate a call, then
I'd
say yes. If not, no. *shrug*
7. This is a design thing, and can lead to some serious sub-optimal
routing
in your network. Will you be counted off for that? Maybe, maybe not.
But
there is no perfect answer for this one.
8. See the archives. You don't have to unless the lab says to. Many
people do like the magical stuff, many people do not. I'm one of the
latter, but that's just me!
All of these questions are great ones, but unfortunately, they may also
come
with the "it depends" caveat! Try different things in context of the
lab
you are working on to see what does or doesn't happen. You'll learn
lots
along the way, and may answer your own question, at least within that
topology set!
Cheers,
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Desmond Ong
Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2005 6:44 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Workbooks practice doubts
Hi there,
i am having some doubts while doing my workbooks...
1) if i want to prevent telnet access to my router, i need to put in
access-class XXX under line vty 0 4. do i need to put it under line vty
5
15?
2) how to determine which side of the isdn router to put the isdn ospf
demand circuit command? can i put on both sides?
3)when ask not to use static mapping on atm, how to i configure
4) under atm, when ask not to rely on remote router for arp, i need to
configure "no protocol ip inarp" together with no atm "ilmi-keepalive"
right?
5) under frame-relay, when ask not to rely on remote router for arp, i
need
to put " no frame-relay inarp", how about no arp frame-relay" so that i
will
not response to other router arp request...
6)Does the "dialer-load threshold either" command need to put on both
side
of the isdn router when not explicitly asked?
7)when configuring bgp, if by next hop is available by IGP, can i still
put
in the next-hop-self command under every peering to ibgp peers?
8)ipv6 - do we need to put in eui-64 for site local address? i
understand is
for automatically assigning the host portion of the address...
apologise for the lengthy questions.....
Thanks!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 01 2005 - 09:12:05 GMT-3