From: kevin gannon (kevin@gannons.net)
Date: Sat Nov 05 2005 - 12:13:28 GMT-3
Both using distance and or distribute lists is a valid way
of stopping the loops. The advantage of the distance way
where possible is you do not have to maintain ACLs so
as new routes get advertised you do not have to update
the ACL's.
It is not always possible to use distance on its own.
Regards
Kevin
On 11/5/05, Cisco Nuts <cisconuts@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hello: Is distribute-lists a good idea to use when doing 2-way
> redistribution b/w Rip and Ospf or for that matter b/w any 2 IGP's in
> general? I have been reading a very good example of this on CCO but did
> not run into this kind of solution (if I recall correctly) when doing the
> InetExp Labs. Even a sample lab from DoIt uses the distance 109 for RIP.
> Permitting all RIP routes into Ospf via the distribute-list out rip under
> Ospf while denying all RIP routes in via the distribute-list out ospf
> under Rip seems to nail it down. Any thoughts on this? Thanks!!
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 01 2005 - 09:12:05 GMT-3