From: Lee Donald (Lee.Donald@t-systems.co.uk)
Date: Wed Nov 02 2005 - 11:51:49 GMT-3
Dustin,
I don't think you will ever know if you missed it by 3 points. You will know
if you are close.
Maybe if you felt you were really close, ask for the re-read anyway?
Regards
Lee.
-----Original Message-----
From: dusth@comcast.net [mailto:dusth@comcast.net]
Sent: 02 November 2005 14:36
To: kevin gannon; Schulz, Dave
Cc: Wang Dehong-DWANG1; Chad Hintz; ccie lab
Subject: Re: Hopefully last time
How are we to determine if want to have a re-read anyway if Cisco does not
give us the real points on the report instead of % on each section? Then,
how do we know we only miss the passsing mark by 2 or 3 point?Regards.Dustin
-------------- Original message --------------
> I have done both and they have different merits. The checkit is great
> as you have access to both configs and you can do show commands
> on both your config and there's like a virtual set of routers so you
> can see the impact of what you did or didn't do which helps in
> knowing you wer not right and why.
>
> I did the lab with the chat with Brian afterwords I passed the lab
> so there was little to talk about on the actual lab. But I did get
> a chance to ask some technical questions which was useful I
> find it easier to discuss issues verbally than via email.
>
> I would tend to go for the checkit labs to hone your skills long term.
> The IE one gives you a chance to chat with the brian(s) so might
> be better for some people.
>
> Re-reads seem to be a waste of money, I long for the days when
> you discussed your results face to face with the proctor maybe
> this will come back.
>
> Regards
> Kevin
>
> On 11/1/05, Schulz, Dave wrote:
> > I think that this may be a good idea on doing the Checkit. I was
> > considering doing this with the IE, noticing that they have a mock lab.
> > Is one more preferable than another. This re-read is becoming a
> > trend....Cisco may have found a new revenue stream. ;-)
> >
> >
> > Dave Schulz,
> > Email: dschulz@dpsciences.com
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > kevin gannon
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 3:36 PM
> > To: Wang Dehong-DWANG1
> > Cc: Chad Hintz; ccie lab
> > Subject: Re: Hopefully last time
> >
> > I feel your pain from previous attempts the scoring is painful.
> > I have done some of the netmasterclass checkit labs recently.
> > On each one I thought I aced it for sure. When I got the results
> > it was a bit of a shock to see how easy it is to loose points.
> > I found it useful seeing the master config versus mine. They
> > have a web tool which allows you to do show commands
> > on my config vs theres. Finding it helps a lot doing another
> > one at the weekend. Wish I had found this earlier !
> >
> > Regards
> > Kevin
> >
> > On 11/1/05, Wang Dehong-DWANG1 wrote:
> > > With the mysterious Cisco scoring system, it will be a trend that
> > people
> > > will request more re-read since points are not given or so low on some
> > > sections and we don't know why. Here is one story you may not have
> > heard
> > > of. After spotting a lab conflict and did not get clarification when
> > > doing lab, I wrote to Cisco and they did agree to give me 3 points
> > back.
> > > With one question point away from passing, I requested a re-read, the
> > > result came out one month later with a lower score but they waived my
> > > re-read fee. I got 3 but lost 6 in other two sections. That is what
> > > says on the web, result can vary from proctor to proctor.
> > >
> > > What else can we do?
> > >
> > > - Dehong
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> > Of
> > > Chad Hintz
> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 12:58 PM
> > > To: ccie lab
> > > Subject: Hopefully last time
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I took my 3rd attempt yesterday, I recieved my score report within an
> > > hour and half of leaving the exam. I have submitted for a re read, I
> > > know that this usually doesn't change the outcome, but at least there
> > is
> > > a chance. Has anyone ever had their score report so fast? I
> > researched
> > > my lab after the exam on cisco.com, just to triple check my
> > > configurations were correct. I have thought I pass before but then
> > left
> > > the lab questioning some of my configurations, this time it was not
> > the
> > > case I still look back and do not understand the outcome. Sorry
> > > sometimes you need to vent to the people who have been through it.
> > >
> > >
> > > Chad
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------
> > > Yahoo! FareChase - Search multiple travel sites in one click.
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > > --
> > > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > > believed to be clean.
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > --
> > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > believed to be clean.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 01 2005 - 09:12:04 GMT-3