From: kevin gannon (kevin@gannons.net)
Date: Wed Nov 02 2005 - 11:42:36 GMT-3
If you memorise the per section points given you can do a rough
guess of how close you came. For example there was 10 points
for Services and you got 50% that most likely means you got
5 points out of 80.
Regards
Kevin
On 11/2/05, dusth@comcast.net <dusth@comcast.net> wrote:
> How are we to determine if want to have a re-read anyway if Cisco does not give us the real points on the report instead of % on each section? Then, how do we know we only miss the passsing mark by 2 or 3 point?Regards.Dustin
> -------------- Original message --------------
>
> > I have done both and they have different merits. The checkit is great
> > as you have access to both configs and you can do show commands
> > on both your config and there's like a virtual set of routers so you
> > can see the impact of what you did or didn't do which helps in
> > knowing you wer not right and why.
> >
> > I did the lab with the chat with Brian afterwords I passed the lab
> > so there was little to talk about on the actual lab. But I did get
> > a chance to ask some technical questions which was useful I
> > find it easier to discuss issues verbally than via email.
> >
> > I would tend to go for the checkit labs to hone your skills long term.
> > The IE one gives you a chance to chat with the brian(s) so might
> > be better for some people.
> >
> > Re-reads seem to be a waste of money, I long for the days when
> > you discussed your results face to face with the proctor maybe
> > this will come back.
> >
> > Regards
> > Kevin
> >
> > On 11/1/05, Schulz, Dave wrote:
> > > I think that this may be a good idea on doing the Checkit. I was
> > > considering doing this with the IE, noticing that they have a mock lab.
> > > Is one more preferable than another. This re-read is becoming a
> > > trend....Cisco may have found a new revenue stream. ;-)
> > >
> > >
> > > Dave Schulz,
> > > Email: dschulz@dpsciences.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > > kevin gannon
> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 3:36 PM
> > > To: Wang Dehong-DWANG1
> > > Cc: Chad Hintz; ccie lab
> > > Subject: Re: Hopefully last time
> > >
> > > I feel your pain from previous attempts the scoring is painful.
> > > I have done some of the netmasterclass checkit labs recently.
> > > On each one I thought I aced it for sure. When I got the results
> > > it was a bit of a shock to see how easy it is to loose points.
> > > I found it useful seeing the master config versus mine. They
> > > have a web tool which allows you to do show commands
> > > on my config vs theres. Finding it helps a lot doing another
> > > one at the weekend. Wish I had found this earlier !
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Kevin
> > >
> > > On 11/1/05, Wang Dehong-DWANG1 wrote:
> > > > With the mysterious Cisco scoring system, it will be a trend that
> > > people
> > > > will request more re-read since points are not given or so low on some
> > > > sections and we don't know why. Here is one story you may not have
> > > heard
> > > > of. After spotting a lab conflict and did not get clarification when
> > > > doing lab, I wrote to Cisco and they did agree to give me 3 points
> > > back.
> > > > With one question point away from passing, I requested a re-read, the
> > > > result came out one month later with a lower score but they waived my
> > > > re-read fee. I got 3 but lost 6 in other two sections. That is what
> > > > says on the web, result can vary from proctor to proctor.
> > > >
> > > > What else can we do?
> > > >
> > > > - Dehong
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> > > Of
> > > > Chad Hintz
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 12:58 PM
> > > > To: ccie lab
> > > > Subject: Hopefully last time
> > > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > I took my 3rd attempt yesterday, I recieved my score report within an
> > > > hour and half of leaving the exam. I have submitted for a re read, I
> > > > know that this usually doesn't change the outcome, but at least there
> > > is
> > > > a chance. Has anyone ever had their score report so fast? I
> > > researched
> > > > my lab after the exam on cisco.com, just to triple check my
> > > > configurations were correct. I have thought I pass before but then
> > > left
> > > > the lab questioning some of my configurations, this time it was not
> > > the
> > > > case I still look back and do not understand the outcome. Sorry
> > > > sometimes you need to vent to the people who have been through it.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Chad
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------
> > > > Yahoo! FareChase - Search multiple travel sites in one click.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > > >
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > > > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > > > believed to be clean.
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > > --
> > > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > > believed to be clean.
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 01 2005 - 09:12:04 GMT-3