From: Graham Hopkins (ghopkins@wolf-rock.co.uk)
Date: Wed Nov 02 2005 - 07:16:05 GMT-3
For the 2500s you wil need c2500-is-l.122-15.T17.bin which has OSPF V3 but
no IS-IS
For the 2600s use tftpdnld -r command
Regards
Graham Hopkins
----- Original Message -----
From: "Leonard Lu" <llu_ccie@yahoo.com>
To: "simon hart" <simon@harttel.com>; "Schulz, Dave"
<DSchulz@dpsciences.com>; "Dave Temkin" <dave@ordinaryworld.com>;
<nobody@groupstudy.com>; "Victor Cappuccio" <cvictor@protokolgroup.com>
Cc: "Bajo" <bajoalex@gmail.com>; "Chula Bandara"
<chula_bandara@hotmail.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 3:01 AM
Subject: RE: ipv6
> In the CCIE R&S Lab Blueprint, IPv6 is under IGP and BGP, does that mean
> it will cover RIPng (RIP for IPv6), OSPFv3 (OSPF for IPv6) and MP BGP for
> IPv6?
>
> I have another question here for the hardware I can use for these IPv6
> routing protocols. I have some 2610 and 2620 routers, and all of them have
> 64MB/16MB memory. For 2510 routers, I found the IOS image which supports
> RIPng and MP BGP for IPv6, but doesn't support OSPFv3 and IPv6 QoS. For
> 2620 routers, I found the IOS image which support RIPng, MP BGP for IPv6,
> OSPFv3, and IPv6 QoS. However, this iamge needs 64MB/32MB memory. So I can
> install this image on the 2620 routers.
>
> Someone told me that there is a trick you can install (tftp) the image
> into DRAM (thus by pass the flash memory) and run the IOS from the DRAM on
> 2620. In addtion, you can even put 2600XM IOS image on 2620 router by
> using that trick. If that is true, then it will be great because 2600XM
> image can cover complete feature sets of 12.3 and 12.4 (Advanced
> Enterprise version), which can cover all IPv6 features such as IPv6
> Multicast, IPv6 policy-base routing, IPv6 IS-IS. But I just don't know how
> to do that.
>
>
>
> Certainly another way is to buy 2600XM routers, but that will be really
> too expensive for me.
>
>
>
> Thanks you very much for the help.
>
>
>
> --Leonard
>
>
> simon hart <simon@harttel.com> wrote:
> I would suggest that you make yourself familiar with IPv6 QOS, NAT-PT and
> tunneling. I am not saying these will necessarily be on the lab, but I am
> sure they can come up.
>
> Just because the blueprint does not have a section on IPv6 QOS or IPv6
> NAT-PT explicitly does not mean a thing.
>
> When you read the blueprint, I would treat it as a general topic. The
> blueprint says QOS - not IPv4 QOS. The blueprint mentions GRE, mmm, that
> is
> Generic Routing Encapsulation - which means you can use it for almost
> anything (not just IPv4).
>
> When there is an expectation of full reachability you need to know all
> your
> options, this includes IPv4 and IPv6 - so NAT-PT, ISATAP, 6to4 I would say
> are all fair game. So I would do yourselves a favour and at least
> familiarise yourselves with these topics, find where they are on the DocCd
> and configure them at least a few times in order to understand where the
> pitfalls are.
>
> Prior to my last attempt, I think I tried and covered every IPv6 scenario
> I
> could make up from the command set / configuration guide on the DocCd. I
> really think this put me in good stead for the IPv6 section of the lab.
> Not
> even 5% of the IPv6 stuff I learned was covered in the lab, but it made
> that
> little 5% heck of a lot easier.
>
> HTH
>
> Simon
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Schulz, Dave
> Sent: 30 October 2005 23:27
> To: Dave Temkin ; nobody@groupstudy.com; Victor Cappuccio
> Cc: Bajo ; Chula Bandara ; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: ipv6
>
>
> Agreed. I had heard this same thing from one of the proctors...expect more
> core technologies, not necessarily more IPv6.
>
>
> Dave
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> To: Victor Cappuccio
> Cc: Bajo; Chula Bandara; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Sent: 10/30/2005 12:16 PM
> Subject: Re: ipv6
>
> In talking with the proctor before the lab, we inquired about the
> changes
> coming in January. He said to expect other features to be added (IOS
> features in 12.3/4, etc.. to make up the lost points) and that they
> wouldn't
> necessarily beef up IPv6 past where it is today because they don't see
> the demand for it.
>
>
>
> On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Victor Cappuccio wrote:
>
>> That Fair Game Stuff Sounds Great, so they could have something to
> make you
>> think a while, and know where to find stuff in the Doc CD. But what
> about
>> today's Lab what's the likelihood you get questions outside the
> blueprint.
>> (not next year Lab?)
>>
>> Nice Question Chula!
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Bajo"
>> To: "Chula Bandara"
>> Cc:
>> Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 7:06 PM
>> Subject: Re: ipv6
>>
>>
>> > Hi Chula,
>> > Without breaking NDA and given ISDN, ATM, etc are removed, you
> should
>> > expect more of IPv6. Anything is a fair game.
>> >
>> > On 10/28/05, Chula Bandara wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Hi all i am going through the archives for couple of weeks now. i
> have
>> > > seen
>> > > IPv6 QOS , IPv6 NAT-PT
>> > > questions being discussed.
>> > >
>> > > I see IPV6 only under IGP and BGP sections of the R&S blueprint. (
> not
>> > > under
>> > > QOS or IP IOS features)
>> > > whats the likelyhood you get questions outside the blueprint.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks
>> > >
>> > >
> _______________________________________________________________________
>> > > Subscription information may be found at:
>> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Kind Regards,
>> >
>> > Bajo
>> >
>> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
>> > Subscription information may be found at:
>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.361 / Virus Database: 267.12.6/151 - Release Date: 28/10/2005
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.361 / Virus Database: 267.12.6/151 - Release Date: 28/10/2005
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! FareChase - Search multiple travel sites in one click.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 01 2005 - 09:12:04 GMT-3