From: Wang Dehong-DWANG1 (Dehong.Wang@motorola.com)
Date: Wed Nov 02 2005 - 02:11:59 GMT-3
Also don't forget static RP, ip pim rp-address < > can be very helpful
as well and it works pefectly with spare-mode.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Niche
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 9:19 PM
To: Scott Morris
Cc: Michael Brooks; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Does PIM dense mode or sparse-dense mode work over frame
relay?
Hi guys,
Talking about sparse-mode, something come up my mind..
If the question request you to only run sparse-mode on all multicast
interfaces, there are 2 options can be configured for auto-rp type
multicast setup.
1. BSR
2. Auto-RP with "ip pim autorp listener" on all non-RP multicast
routers.
I am wondering whether Proctor will give me information for which way I
should do if I cannot figure out after I read the question statement.
By the way, thanks alot for Chris, Scott and Michael for the
information.
Cheers~
Jacky
On 11/2/05, Scott Morris <swm@emanon.com> wrote:
>
> Ok, so they have pictures and I didn't. :)
>
> Thanks! I was looking for that before, but didn't find it in a timely
> fashion!
>
> Scott
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> Of Michael Brooks
> Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 9:52 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: Does PIM dense mode or sparse-dense mode work over frame
> relay?
>
> This explains it also:
>
> http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/intsolns/mcst_sol/frm
> _rlay
> .
> h
> tm#69070
>
> Regards,
> Mike
> On 11/1/05, Scott Morris <swm@emanon.com> wrote:
> >
> > Actually, it's a very good reference book all around. But you're
> > right, it's just for multicast. If you aren't ever going to run
> > multicast in real-life, you probably don't care! :)
> >
> > On the other hand, Amazon.com <http://Amazon.com>
> > <http://Amazon.com>
> offers it used as
> > well to save money!
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> > Of dusth@comcast.net
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 9:37 PM
> > To: test; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Re: Does PIM dense mode or sparse-dense mode work over
> > frame relay?
> >
> > Sound like the millionaire talking here:). spent $50.00 just for one
> > question topic:) I'm not Mr. Bill Gate.
> >
> > -------------- Original message --------------
> >
> > > The Williamson multicast book around page 464 really provided that
> > > 'ah-ha' moment for me about the subject.
> > >
> > > Ben
> > >
> > > cciein2006@yahoo.com wrote:
> > >
> > > >Does PIM dense mode or sparse-dense mode work over frame relay? I
> > > >tried the ip
> > > pim nbma-mode command on a multipoint frame-relay interface but it
> > > generates an error message saying that PIM nbma-mode is not
> > > recommended for dense mode or sparse-dense mode?
> > > >
> > > >Why is this?
> > > >
> > > >_________________________________________________________________
> > > >__ __ __ Subscription information may be found at:
> > > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________________________
> > > __ __ _ Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________________
> > __ _ Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________________
> > __ _ Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _ Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _ Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 01 2005 - 09:12:04 GMT-3