From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Wed Oct 26 2005 - 21:26:00 GMT-3
IMHO, the key would be "accept any packets". In your method, you aren't
accepting any ROUTES, but you do have an EIGRP neighbor relationship and
therefore are getting packets.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Victor Cappuccio
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 8:18 PM
To: Cisco certification
Subject: is this acceptable?
Hello All,
If I have a EIGRP neighbor relationship between 2 Routers in a NBMA Network
in AS 10, and the wording indicates that In order to prevent routing issues
over this Network, ensure that R1 does not accept any EIGRP packets on the
NBMA Interface
Ok the topology is like this
R1 --| NBMA |-- R2
I think that a valid solution could be:
Rack1R1#show run | be router eigrp
router eigrp 10
network 54.0.0.0
metric weights 0 3 1 1 1 0
distance 90 54.1.6.254 0.0.0.0
! Where 54.1.6.254 is Router 2
distance 255 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255
! Deny every thing to be installed in the Rtable.
no auto-summary
The solution that appers in the WB (IE Lab 5 Tasks 5.23-5.25.-I'm not saying
that is wrong)
access-list 102 permit eigrp host 54.1.6.254 any access-list 102 deny eigrp
any any access-list 102 permit ip any any log
interface Serial0/0
ip address 54.1.6.6 255.255.255.0
ip access-group 102 in
So my question now if the First method is acceptable?
Regards
Victor.
-- Victor Cappuccio cvictor@protokolgroup.com .O. ..O OOO
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Nov 06 2005 - 22:00:54 GMT-3