From: Jaycee Cockburn - BCX SS (Jaycee.Cockburn@bcx.co.za)
Date: Tue Oct 25 2005 - 12:10:06 GMT-3
Hi D,
I Think...
When used under "router rip"
"distribute-list 20 out ospf 1"
Means advertise out to other rip speakers all routes learned from ospf
process 1 allowed by access-list 20
...advertising all ospf learned routes except 150.1.1.1/32 to other rip
routers
"distribute-list 20 in"
Means filter routes permitted by access-list 20 incoming from other rip
speaking routers
..allowing all except 150.1.1.1/32
HTH
Cheers
JC
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
dusth@comcast.net
Sent: 25 October 2005 04:50 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: distribute-list out vs. in
Hi group,
I'm labbing up some of my doubted knowledge about distribute-list in/out
using when there are redistribution b/t protocols.
Here is my acl:
access-list 20 deny 150.1.1.1
access-list 20 permit any
I have OSPF and RIP mutual redistribute. Under RIP if I use
"distribute-list 20 out ospf 1" vs. "distribute-list 20 in", they give
me same result.
So here is my question: does the "distribute-list 20 out ospf 1" mean
deny route 150.1.1.1 OUT FROM OSPF entering into RIP? and does it also
equipvalent to "distribute-list 20 in" which mean deny 150.1.1. into
RIP?
Which method is more preferable?
Thanks in advance,
Dustin
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Nov 06 2005 - 22:00:52 GMT-3