RE: On one end or both?

From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Sat Oct 22 2005 - 13:53:36 GMT-3


It'll depend on your situation. In the lab, since there isn't exactly any
sane realistic design, I would do exactly what is asked and no more, no
less....

In the real world your needs may vary. While your QoS design is end to end,
your implementation is at certain points.

Scott
 

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Gary
Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2005 8:43 PM
To: George Amen
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: On one end or both?

Neither Caslow or the cisco website seem to say you should do it both ends.
I would like to know too.
----- Original Message -----
From: "George Amen" <george.amen@gmail.com>
To: "Cisco certification" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2005 9:08 AM
Subject: FRTS: On one end or both?

> R1-s0---------FR Cloud-------------s0-R2
>
> I understand that it all depends on the wording of the qs, but in
> general if the qs starts like this "Configure R1".. and we are asked
> to fix an on-going congestion issue between R1 and R2 using FRTS by
> using a pre-defined set of CIR, AR, BE, TC, BECN,. (calculate BC)...
> would I be applying this "FR map-class" on both ends or just R1-s0 ?
>
> Unless both end have the same CIR, BE, BC etc,.. it doesnt even make
> sense to ask this qs,,, but lets say they are the same...... and what
> if they both have different parameters.....? I've recently managed to
> understand how to calculate all the above FR parameters... just
> missing the application in various scenario....
>
> any help would be appreciated.
>
> -GA
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _ Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Nov 06 2005 - 22:00:52 GMT-3