From: Victor Cappuccio (cvictor@protokolgroup.com)
Date: Thu Oct 13 2005 - 03:19:06 GMT-3
I wish to have a CCIE rack to play but for now, I just have a 3640 gift
from a good Friend... (I know that only with one router would not let
me understand anything but it's cool to check weird configurations or
command parameters / Do someone from the other side of the world (My
time zone is GMT -4) have a rack that does not uses in the night and be
so generous to share it? :-) )
R1:
interface FastEthernet0/0
ip address 10.0.0.1 255.0.0.0 secondary
! Thats why I told about to create a secondary address - I did not
finish the idea when I sent the email / I Think I'm getting Crazy with
all this stuffs.. Sorry for that
ip address 10.50.50.2 255.255.255.248
speed 100
full-duplex
R2:
interface FastEthernet4/0
ip address 10.60.60.1 255.255.255.248
ip mobile arp access-group 2
duplex full
access-list 2 permit 10.50.50.2
De Witt, Duane wrote:
>I don't think this scenario would work. LAM would require R1 and R2
>ethernet to be in the same subnet, however it will allow users on R1
>ethernet to be on a subnet allocate somewhere else in the network.
>
>If R1 and R2 ethernet are in different subnets how will you get
>communication going between the two?
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>Victor Cappuccio
>Sent: 13 October 2005 07:50 AM
>Cc: Cisco certification
>Subject: Re: Router with out any routing Protocol
>
>Ok this one was easy, lets change the Scenario a little bit, using the
>same same topology, but now R1 is in a different Subnet than R2, so now
>we need to configure LAM on R2, and Redistributing the mobile into the
>ospf gives R3 the way to get to R1, but what about the return traffic R1
>
>-> R3?
>
>Thanks
>Victor.
>
>
>
>
>manoj menon wrote:
>
>
>
>>On R1#
>>
>>no ip routing
>>!
>>ip default-gateway <R2-E0-IP_ADD>
>>!
>>Either you can advertise the R1-R2 Ethernet subnet in OSPF, or
>>redistribute, or static route back to R1, and redistribute static into
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>OSPF...
>>
>>Comments...
>>
>>Regards,
>>Mnaoj
>>
>>*/Victor Cappuccio <cvictor@protokolgroup.com>/* wrote:
>>
>> Hello People, consider this Scenario
>>
>> 10.1.1.0/24
>> R1 --- Ethernet --- R2 | Network Cloud Running OSPF | R3.
>> ---Vlan 50 ----
>>
>> You are not allowed to configure any routing protocol on R1, but
>> one of
>> the requirements is that R1 should be able to ping any ip address
>> in R3,
>> how would you accomplish this? I thought to create a secondary
>> address
>> in R1 with an IP Classful Address Mask (10.0.0.1/8) and complete
>> the ARP
>> Table for R3 physical interfaces with R2 Ethernet Mac Address
>> (since R2
>> knows the complete network).- I Think this could work Ok / Have
>>
>>
>not
>
>
>> tested yet .. Can you see another was of accomplishing this task?
>>
>>
>> Regards
>> Victor.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>
>
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>>Yahoo! Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it free.
>>
>>
>>
><http://pa.yahoo.com/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=36035/*http://music.yah
>oo.com/unlimited/>
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Nov 06 2005 - 22:00:50 GMT-3