From: De Witt, Duane (duane.dewitt@siemens.com)
Date: Thu Oct 13 2005 - 02:56:43 GMT-3
I don't think this scenario would work. LAM would require R1 and R2
ethernet to be in the same subnet, however it will allow users on R1
ethernet to be on a subnet allocate somewhere else in the network.
If R1 and R2 ethernet are in different subnets how will you get
communication going between the two?
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Victor Cappuccio
Sent: 13 October 2005 07:50 AM
Cc: Cisco certification
Subject: Re: Router with out any routing Protocol
Ok this one was easy, lets change the Scenario a little bit, using the
same same topology, but now R1 is in a different Subnet than R2, so now
we need to configure LAM on R2, and Redistributing the mobile into the
ospf gives R3 the way to get to R1, but what about the return traffic R1
-> R3?
Thanks
Victor.
manoj menon wrote:
> On R1#
>
> no ip routing
> !
> ip default-gateway <R2-E0-IP_ADD>
> !
> Either you can advertise the R1-R2 Ethernet subnet in OSPF, or
> redistribute, or static route back to R1, and redistribute static into
> OSPF...
>
> Comments...
>
> Regards,
> Mnaoj
>
> */Victor Cappuccio <cvictor@protokolgroup.com>/* wrote:
>
> Hello People, consider this Scenario
>
> 10.1.1.0/24
> R1 --- Ethernet --- R2 | Network Cloud Running OSPF | R3.
> ---Vlan 50 ----
>
> You are not allowed to configure any routing protocol on R1, but
> one of
> the requirements is that R1 should be able to ping any ip address
> in R3,
> how would you accomplish this? I thought to create a secondary
> address
> in R1 with an IP Classful Address Mask (10.0.0.1/8) and complete
> the ARP
> Table for R3 physical interfaces with R2 Ethernet Mac Address
> (since R2
> knows the complete network).- I Think this could work Ok / Have
not
> tested yet .. Can you see another was of accomplishing this task?
>
>
> Regards
> Victor.
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Nov 06 2005 - 22:00:50 GMT-3