From: Private Ryan (pv.ryan@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Oct 09 2005 - 10:49:26 GMT-3
from the police statement:
- conform-action transmit ( traffic below 1000000 , conform)
- exceed-action set-prec-transmit 0 ( traffic between 1000000 and
1000000+31250*8 , set precedence to 0 and transmit)
- violate-action drop ( drop if above the 1000000+31250*8)
I have poor concept on be and pir. please correct me if I make mistake. Thanks !
Ryan
2005/10/9, simon hart <simon@harttel.com>:
> Ryan,
>
> Not sure how you came to 1250000 drops everything. Provide us with your
> math on this and perhaps we can clear things up.
>
> Simon
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Private Ryan
> Sent: 09 October 2005 04:23
> To: simon hart
> Cc: Chris Lewis; dusth@comcast.net; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: rate-limit vs. police
>
>
> hi
>
> I understand that the situration that police command in following:
>
> police cir 1000000 bc 31250 be 1000
> conform-action transmit
> exceed-action set-prec-transmit 0
> violate-action drop
>
> traffic rate < 1000000bps = allow transmit
> traffic rate > 1000000bps = using token in bc 31250 bytes
> traffic rate > 1250000bps = drop everything.
>
> If I put pir (i.e. police cir 1000000 bc 31250 pir 2000000 be 1000)
> since everything is drop after 1250000bps, what is the use of PIR ?
>
> Thanks !
>
> Ryan
>
>
>
> 2005/10/9, simon hart <simon@harttel.com>:
> > ............and here is the config for a sample two rate three colour
> > marker - enjoy :)
> >
> > police cir 1000000 bc 31250 pir 2000000 be 1000
> > conform-action transmit
> > exceed-action set-dscp-transmit af11
> > violate-action drop
> >
> > Simon
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Chris
> > Lewis
> > Sent: 08 October 2005 20:56
> > To: dusth@comcast.net; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Re: rate-limit vs. police
> >
> >
> > In addition to the other replies, you might consider that with MQC police
> > you have a two rate three color option, which is not there for CAR, as
> that
> > is a single rate three color marker. This wording could appear in the
> exam.
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > dusth@comcast.net wrote:
> > Hi group,
> > Can some one with good knowledge about the differences b/t these two
> method
> > and shed me some light? I'm confused when to use rate-limit and when to
> use
> > police. Basically, I read the cco docs look like they all both offer same
> > functions to me
> > Thanks, Dustin
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Yahoo! Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it free.
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > --
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> > Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.13/124 - Release Date:
> 07/10/2005
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> > Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.13/124 - Release Date:
> 07/10/2005
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.13/124 - Release Date: 07/10/2005
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.13/124 - Release Date: 07/10/2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Nov 06 2005 - 22:00:50 GMT-3