From: Pierre-Alex (paguanel@hotmail.com)
Date: Sun Oct 09 2005 - 10:39:53 GMT-3
Has anyone checked the statement on Cisco doc that says " if split horizon
is enabled, neither an automatic summary address nor the interface summary
address is advertised.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1835/products_configuration
_guide_chapter09186a00800ca760.html
I am finding otherwise:
-----------------------------------------------
!
interface Loopback1
ip address 10.10.1.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Loopback2
ip address 10.10.2.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Loopback3
ip address 10.10.3.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Loopback4
ip address 10.10.4.1 255.255.255.0
interface Ethernet2/0
ip address 10.126.23.1 255.255.255.0
ip summary-address rip 10.10.0.0 255.255.252.0
half-duplex
end
Mar 13 22:12:52.543: RIP: build flash update entries
*Mar 13 22:12:52.543: 10.126.2.0/29 via 0.0.0.0, metric 2, tag 0
*Mar 13 22:12:52.979: RIP: sending v2 update to 224.0.0.9 via Ethernet2/0
(10.126.23.1)
*Mar 13 22:12:52.979: RIP: build update entries
*Mar 13 22:12:52.979: 10.10.0.0/22 via 0.0.0.0, metric 1, tag 0
*Mar 13 22:12:52.979: 10.10.4.0/24 via 0.0.0.0, metric 1, tag 0
*Mar 13 22:12:52.979: 10.126.1.0/29 via 0.0.0.0, metric 1, tag 0
*Mar 13 22:12:52.979: 10.126.2.0/29 via 0.0.0.0, metric 2, tag 0
*Mar 13 22:12:57.823: RIP: sending v2 update to 224.0.0.9 via Ethernet2/0
(10.126.23.1)
*Mar 13 22:12:57.823: RIP: build update entries
*Mar 13 22:12:57.823: 10.10.0.0/22 via 0.0.0.0, metric 1, tag 0
*Mar 13 22:12:57.823: 10.10.4.0/24 via 0.0.0.0, metric 1, tag 0
*Mar 13 22:12:57.823: 10.126.1.0/29 via 0.0.0.0, metric 1, tag 0
*Mar 13 22:12:57.823: 10.126.2.0/29 via 0.0.0.0, metric 2, tag 0
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Nov 06 2005 - 22:00:50 GMT-3