From: Victor Cappuccio (cvictor@protokolgroup.com)
Date: Tue Oct 04 2005 - 15:41:19 GMT-3
Hello Narcis, please can you clarify a little bit the wording..
Other point of view could be that RIP should not be part of the
interesting traffic
Looking forward to your email
Regards
Victor.
micsoniu@telus.net wrote:
>Would it be possibel to use the "ip rip triggered" feature on both routers
>connected through ISDN in order to satisfy the following requirement ?
>
>- "Make sure ISDN does not stay up indefinitely"
>
>or snapshot routing is the only option ?
>
>Obviously, RIP is the only traffic going across this link...
>
>According to CCO:
>
>http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios123/123cgcr/iprrp_r/ip2_i1g.htm#wp1040537
>
>"You might want to enable this feature if you are using an on-demand circuit and
>you are charged for usage time. Fewer routing updates will incur lower usage costs."
>
>"Entries learned from a triggered response on the WAN are semipermanent; they do
>not time out like other entries"
>
>Thank you
>
>Narcis
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Nov 06 2005 - 22:00:49 GMT-3