From: Brian McGahan (bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Mon Oct 03 2005 - 18:17:52 GMT-3
The process-id is only locally significant. RIP is a distance
vector protocol, and does not use link-state areas like OSPF and IS-IS
do.
HTH,
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of DP
> Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 12:54 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RipNG Question
>
> I have a general question about RipNG
>
> Example:
> I have two routers connected via e0/0 R1 e0/0 and lo0 belongs to AREA1
and
> R2 e0/0 belongs to AREA2. Should the R2 see R1 since its in a
different
> RIP
> area. I labbed this up and was able to see the lo0 on R2 in a
different
> area. Is this normal, or should it behave like ISIS does with
different
> areas. The docs i have read just say you need to use the process ID
but
> nothing about what happens if they dont match. Thanks in advance.
>
>
> DP
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Nov 06 2005 - 22:00:49 GMT-3