Frame-relay map and Frame-relay inteface-dlci Are mutually

From: Victor Cappuccio (cvictor@protokolgroup.com)
Date: Mon Oct 03 2005 - 12:52:36 GMT-3

• Next message: kevin gannon: "Re: Frame-relay map and Frame-relay inteface-dlci Are mutually"
• Previous message: Brian McGahan: "RE: InternetworkExpert CoD not working ?"
• Next in thread: kevin gannon: "Re: Frame-relay map and Frame-relay inteface-dlci Are mutually"
• Maybe reply: kevin gannon: "Re: Frame-relay map and Frame-relay inteface-dlci Are mutually"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: Frame-relay map and Frame-relay inteface-dlci Are mutually"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hello All,

I do not get it, I though that Frame-relay maps and Frame-relay
interface-dlci where mutually exclusive, any that they could not exist
on the same interface
Please see IPexpert's CCIE R&S Lab WB --> Section 36 (Multiprotocol
Challenge R)

..

frame-relay map ip 136.10.100.2 105
frame-relay map ip 136.10.100.5 105
frame-relay map ip 136.10.100.6 106
frame-relay interface-dlci 105
class frts_R5 broadcast
frame-relay interface-dlci 106
class frts_R6 broadcast

Thoughts?

Regards
Victor

• Next message: kevin gannon: "Re: Frame-relay map and Frame-relay inteface-dlci Are mutually"
• Previous message: Brian McGahan: "RE: InternetworkExpert CoD not working ?"
• Next in thread: kevin gannon: "Re: Frame-relay map and Frame-relay inteface-dlci Are mutually"
• Maybe reply: kevin gannon: "Re: Frame-relay map and Frame-relay inteface-dlci Are mutually"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: Frame-relay map and Frame-relay inteface-dlci Are mutually"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Nov 06 2005 - 22:00:49 GMT-3