Re: DLSW Switch redundancy ?

From: Victor Cappuccio (cvictor@protokolgroup.com)
Date: Sun Oct 02 2005 - 00:14:43 GMT-3


For now this...

vc@066GR /cygdrive/d/CdDc
$ grep -r F0F0 *
Coincidencia en el fichero binario cc/td/doc/cisintwk/itg_v1/tr891502.eps
Coincidencia en el fichero binario
cc/td/doc/product/wanbu/mgx8850/vism30/vm30_0
2.htm
temp/127.0.0.1_8080/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/itg_v1/tr1920.htm:<P> 4. If
multiple f
ilters or filters using access lists with multiple statements exist,
apply each
filter individually to identify the problem filter. Check the
configuration for
input and output LSAP2 and TYPE
filters, which
 can be used simultaneously to block different protocols. For example,
LSAP (F0F
0) can be used to block NetBIOS, and TYPE<EM> </EM>(6004) can be used to
block l
ocal-area transport.</P>
*
Troubleshooting Transparent Bridging Environments*

& Still Browsing .. I wish my machine had more memory, however she Rocks!!

Victor Cappuccio wrote:

> Upps Sorry I pressed the send button without finishing the email, I'm
> not an English Speaker, please excuse my mistake ** know == now **
> now The problem would be how to load the File in the Application that
> the DocCD uses
> ..
> And Still Browsing...
>
>
> Victor Cappuccio wrote:
>
>> Still Browsing... Nice one to where is it!!
>>
>> vc@066GR /cygdrive/d/CdDc
>> $ grep -r F0F0 *
>> Coincidencia en el fichero binario
>> cc/td/doc/cisintwk/itg_v1/tr891502.eps
>> Coincidencia en el fichero binario
>> cc/td/doc/product/wanbu/mgx8850/vism30/vm30_0
>> 2.htm
>>
>>
>> Know the problem would be hoy to load that File in the
>> Dennis J. Hartmann wrote:
>>
>>> In relation to this, does anyone know where there are some good SAP
>>> codes for filtering in the /univercd?
>>> The only ones I've successfully found in the documentation is from
>>> the 12.3 Source-Route Briding Configuration Guide:
>>>
>>> An access list that passes a frame if it is a NetBIOS frame (SAP =
>>> 0xF0F0) An access list that passes a frame if it is an SNA frame
>>> (SAP = 0x0404)
>>>
>>> ! Access list 201 passes NetBIOS frames (command or response)
>>> access-list 201 permit 0xF0F0 0x0001 ! access-list 202 permit 0x0404
>>> 0x0001 ! Permits SNA frames (command or
>>> response) access-list 202 permit 0x0004 0x0001 ! Permits SNA
>>> Explorers with NULL DSAP
>>> -Dennis Hartmann
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>>> kevin gannon
>>> Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2005 9:30 AM
>>> To: Cisco certification
>>> Subject: DLSW Switch redundancy ?
>>>
>>> I have no real world SNA experience so the below maybe seem daft. I
>>> have
>>> setup up the following
>>>
>>> R1
>>> ------------------
>>> interface FastEthernet0/0
>>> no ip address
>>> duplex auto
>>> speed auto
>>> dlsw transparent redundancy-enable 9999.9999.9999
>>> dlsw transparent map local-mac 4000.0000.0099 remote-mac
>>> 0009.b7d1.6e20
>>>
>>> R5
>>> -------------------
>>> interface FastEthernet0/0
>>> no ip address
>>> duplex auto
>>> speed auto
>>> dlsw transparent redundancy-enable 9999.9999.9999 master-priority 1
>>> dlsw
>>> transparent map local-mac 4000.0000.0002 remote-mac 0090.ed8b.7604
>>>
>>> Both R1 and R5 are attached to the same switch in the same VLAN. On
>>> this
>>> VLAN I have also setup a DSPU listener and on another router I have
>>> setup a
>>> DSPU host. The DSPU traffic is travelling in DLSW and hits R1 in
>>> this case
>>> as this is the router which won the circuit. 0090.ed8b.7604 is the
>>> host by
>>> the way.
>>>
>>> I can see the MAC address translation taking place on R1 :
>>>
>>> R1#
>>> *Mar 1 03:38:42.779: DLSW-ER:action_c(): origin mapped from (wan)
>>> 0090.ed8b.7604 ---> 0200.0000.0099
>>>
>>> So all is well.
>>>
>>> So in the real world if the mainframe recieves the SNA from the MAT'd
>>> address in my case 0200.0000.0099 the MAT it should respond to the
>>> 0200.0000.0099 ?
>>>
>>> If this is the case then in my configs MAT seems to work in only one
>>> direction.
>>> In fact if R1 receieves an explorer for the MAC 0200.0000.0099 it
>>> doesnt
>>> respond and traffic is dropped.Testing using DSPU commands again a
>>> real SNA
>>> host may behave differently ?
>>>
>>> Maybe I should be thinking about this like static IP NAT.
>>>
>>> Thanks & Regards
>>> Kevin
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Nov 06 2005 - 22:00:49 GMT-3