From: Brian Dennis (bdennis@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Sat Sep 24 2005 - 21:02:44 GMT-3
Dustin,
        How is there a hello interval mismatch?
R2:
interface Serial0.2 point-to-point 
 ip address 192.168.5.2 255.255.255.0 
 ip ospf hello-interval 30 
 frame-relay interface-dlci 205
R5:
interface Serial0 
 ip address 192.168.5.5 255.255.255.0 
 encapsulation frame-relay 
 frame-relay map ip 192.168.5.2 502 broadcast 
 no frame-relay inverse-arp 
 frame-relay lmi-type cisco
R2's OSPF network type is point-to-point which means its default hello interval is 10 seconds.  R5's OSPF network type is non-broadcast which means its hello interval is 30 seconds.  Since R2's default hello interval has been change to 30, there isn't a hello timer mismatch.
Here is a tech tip on this exact problem:
Why Are Some OSPF Routes in the Database but Not in the Routing Table?
Reason 1: Network Type Mismatch
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/technologies_tech_note09186a008009481a.shtml#r1
HTH,
Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
bdennis@internetworkexpert.com 
 
Internetwork Expert, Inc. 
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com 
Toll Free: 877-224-8987 
Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada) 
________________________________________
From: dusth@comcast.net [mailto:dusth@comcast.net] 
Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2005 3:58 PM
To: alissitz@cisco.com; Schulz, Dave; Brian Dennis; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: OSPF redistribute connected issue
Problem is hello-internal mismatch. Then, what if change the hello and dead interval on r5 to match with hello interval on r2. Should ospf exchange routing table then?
Regards,Dustin
 
-------------- Original message -------------- 
> debug ip ospf adj - will show any problems with advances 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of 
> dusth@comcast.net 
> Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2005 6:39 PM 
> To: Schulz, Dave; Brian Dennis ; ccielab@groupstudy.com 
> Subject: RE: OSPF redistribute connected issue 
> 
> What if both r2 and r5 are using physical frame-relay but r2 is 
> configured with ip ospf p2p and r5 is configure with ip os p2m? Since 
> they are both physciall frame, should they are adjacence and exchange 
> routing? 
> 
> Regards, Dustin 
> 
> -------------- Original message -------------- 
> 
> > Interesting! I thought that if you adjusted the hello/dead timers to 
> > agree at both ends of the circuit....that the adjacency would come up 
> > and everyone would be happy. Also, I did a debug ip ospf events at 
> > both R2 and R5 and nothing appeared out of the ordinary. What is best 
> > way to debug this if you run into such an issue (I like to create 
> > these "networks that should never happen" labesque type scenarios)? 
> > 
> > Dave 
> > 
> > -----Original Message----- 
> > From: Brian Dennis 
> > To: Schulz, Dave; ccielab@groupstudy.com 
> > Sent: 9/24/2005 3:32 PM 
> > Subject: RE: OSPF redistribute connected issue 
> > 
> > Dave, 
> > You have an OSPF network type mismatch. OSPF network types that do not 
> 
> > use a DR (point-to-point and point-to-multipoint) can not neighbor 
> > with OSPF network types that do use a DR (broadcast and 
> > non-broadcast). They will become "adjacent" with each other if you 
> > adjust the hello timers but they won't become true neighbors. 
> > 
> > HTH, 
> > 
> > Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security) 
> > bdennis@internetworkexpert.com 
> > 
> > Internetwork Expert, Inc. 
> > http://www.InternetworkExpert.com 
> > Toll Free: 877-224-8987 
> > Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada) 
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message----- 
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf 
> Of 
> > Schulz, Dave 
> > Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2005 12:09 PM 
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com 
> > Subject: OSPF redistribute connected issue 
> > 
> > Group - 
> > 
> > Here is an issue that I am having under OSPF.... 
> > 
> > R2 is connected R5 through a pt-pt frame. R2 is the ABR, which has the 
> 
> > area 0 
> > connection. The connection to R5 and R5 in in area 1. I have a number 
> > of 
> > loopbacks set up on R5 (50.50.x.0)....and, when I redistribute into 
> > OSPF, I 
> > can see them at R2 in the ospf database, but they are not showing up 
> in 
> > the 
> > routing table. And, because of this, the loopbacks are not reachable 
> at 
> > the 
> > spokes (other links out on the network connected to R2). Any thoughts 
> > on this 
> > one? 
> > 
> > 
> > R2 config..... 
> > 
> > interface Serial0 
> > no ip address 
> > encapsulation frame-relay 
> > no frame-relay inverse-arp 
> > frame-relay lmi-type cisco 
> > ! 
> > interface Serial0.1 multipoint 
> > ip address 192.168.3.2 255.255.255.0 
> > ip ospf priority 255 
> > frame-relay map ip 192.168.3.2 203 
> > frame-relay map ip 192.168.3.3 203 broadcast 
> > frame-relay map ip 192.168.3.4 204 broadcast 
> > no frame-relay inverse-arp 
> > ! 
> > interface Serial0.2 point-to-point 
> > ip address 192.168.5.2 255.255.255.0 
> > ip ospf hello-interval 30 
> > frame-relay interface-dlci 205 
> > ! 
> > router ospf 1 
> > log-adjacency-changes 
> > network 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 
> > network 192.168.5.0 0.0.0.255 area 1 
> > neighbor 192.168.3.4 
> > neighbor 192.168.3.3 
> > 
> > 
> > On R5 the config is..... 
> > 
> > interface Loopback0 
> > ip address 50.50.50.5 255.255.255.0 
> > ! 
> > interface Loopback10 
> > ip address 50.50.60.5 255.255.255.0 
> > ! 
> > interface Loopback11 
> > ip address 50.50.61.5 255.255.255.0 
> > ! 
> > interface Loopback12 
> > ip address 50.50.62.5 255.255.255.0 
> > ! 
> > interface Loopback13 
> > ip address 50.50.63.5 255.255.255.0 
> > ! 
> > interface Loopback14 
> > ip address 50.50.64.5 255.255.255.0 
> > ! 
> > interface Loopback15 
> > ip address 50.50.65.5 255.255.255.0 
> > ! 
> > interface Loopback16 
> > ip address 50.50.66.5 255.255.255.0 
> > ! 
> > interface Loopback17 
> > ip address 50.50.67.5 255.255.255.0 
> > ! 
> > interface Loopback18 
> > ip address 50.50.68.5 255.255.255.0 
> > ! 
> > interface Serial0 
> > ip address 192.168.5.5 255.255.255.0 
> > encapsulation frame-relay 
> > frame-relay map ip 192.168.5.2 502 broadcast 
> > no frame-relay inverse-arp 
> > frame-relay lmi-type cisco 
> > ! 
> > router ospf 1 
> > router-id 50.50.50.5 
> > log-adjacency-changes 
> > redistribute connected metric 20 metric-type 1 subnets 
> > network 192.168.5.0 0.0.0.255 area 1 
> > 
> > Dave 
> > 
> > 
> _______________________________________________________________________ 
> > Subscription information may be found at: 
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html 
> > 
> > 
> _______________________________________________________________________ 
> > Subscription information may be found at: 
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html 
> 
> _______________________________________________________________________ 
> Subscription information may be found at: 
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html 
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Oct 02 2005 - 14:40:16 GMT-3