From: joshua lauer (jslauer@hotmail.com)
Date: Wed Sep 21 2005 - 08:43:26 GMT-3
Hey guys,
I think this may sound weird.......but I dont think the lab is what
recertifies you, it's the written test. I know this is odd, but that's what
I think. The only thing I've ever seen is that the ccie written is what does
the recert.....
jl
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim" <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>
To: "'Arun Arumuganainar'" <aarumuga@hotmail.com>; "'Scott Morris'"
<swm@emanon.com>; "'Xuguang Yang'" <shawn_yang_1998@yahoo.com>;
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 6:41 AM
Subject: RE: CCIE recertification
> Arun,
>
> I hope you're right about this.
>
> However, I've used the certification tracking tool to see where I stand
> and
> it shows all my previous cert's as expired 3 weeks after I passed the lab
> and got my number.
>
> Is the tracking just slow in updating?
>
> Tim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arun Arumuganainar [mailto:aarumuga@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 4:10 AM
> To: Tim; 'Scott Morris'; 'Xuguang Yang'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: CCIE recertification
>
> If you pass any of the CCIE-lab all your associate and professional
> certification gets recertified with immediate effect .
>
> CCNA , CCDA , CCDP , CCDP , CCNP belongs to this category !!!
>
> Thanks and Regards
> Arun
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tim" <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>
> To: "'Scott Morris'" <swm@emanon.com>; "'Xuguang Yang'"
> <shawn_yang_1998@yahoo.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 8:49 AM
> Subject: RE: CCIE recertification
>
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I'd like your opinions.
>>
>> How likely do you think it would be for someone that just passed the lab
> to
>> be able to take the written a day or 2 later and pass it?
>>
>> Do you think that having enough knowledge to pass the lab makes it highly
>> likely that same person knows enough to pass the written?
>>
>> I recently passed the lab but in the meantime my ccnp and other cert's
>> all
>> expired. If I understand the rules correctly, if I pass the written,
> those
>> other cert's become active again.
>>
>> Is that true?
>>
>> TIA, Tim
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>> Scott Morris
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 1:53 PM
>> To: 'Xuguang Yang'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>> Subject: RE: CCIE recertification
>>
>> Then you have a year to go take the written again! But it still only
>> recertifies you until 2 year mark from your anniversary date (not the
>> date
>> you finally took the written again).
>>
>> Don't lose it completely though, that would hurt! :)
>>
>> Scott
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>> Xuguang Yang
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 1:45 PM
>> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>> Subject: CCIE recertification
>>
>> Hi, there,
>>
>> I got my CCIE two years ago, and never used it. Now it's time to
> recertifiy.
>> Cisco website says that after two years, your status becomes "inactive",
> you
>> can still activate it if you pass the written exam within another year.
> Has
>> anybody done that?
>>
>> I don't care if my status is inactive, but just don't want to lose my
>> CCIE
>> completely.
>>
>> Thanks for any info!
>>
>> Shawn
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Oct 02 2005 - 14:40:16 GMT-3