From: joshua lauer (jslauer@hotmail.com)
Date: Thu Sep 15 2005 - 02:26:40 GMT-3
Very True about the security clearance issue,
it's very hard for private companies to obtain one for you, so they usually
require that you have one when you come onboard. Depending on the level you
need it sometimes would be cheaper for the company to train you from scratch
(from CCNA to CCIE) than it would cost them to clear you. A govt job is
always a possibility too, they will clear you. However, they also do not pay
as much either and you'll have to suffer the time waiting out your
investigation getting paid little. I've seen them hire CCIE's as simple
analysts vice engineers. But, If you do have the clearance..There is a
multitude of jobs for the choosing and they pay well for the most part.
jl
--- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Larus" <tlarus@cox.net>
To: "Vijay Ramcharan" <vramcharan@thedeal.com>
Cc: "Cisco certification" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 9:04 PM
Subject: Re: Newly minted CCIE travelling the well-beaten path of
inexperience
> Vijay Ramcharan wrote:
>
>>I've been searching for an active networking role since July and I'm
>>slowly despairing of ever finding something. Seeking some encouragement,
>>I began searching the GroupStudy archives and found this thread:
>>http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/ccielab/200404/msg00115.html
>>This message in the thread sums it up nicely.
>>http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/ccielab/200404/msg00265.html
>>
>>If I had taken a better look at my situation and gone searching the
>>archives 2 months ago, I'd be less disappointed than I am now. Since I
>>posted my resume on Monster and Dice this July, I've been on a number of
>>interviews but my lack of "large network" experience has been my
>>Achilles heel. That's not to say that I'm inept or anything like that. My
>>most recent round of interviews resulted in this, "Everyone that
>>interviewed you came away very impressed with your knowledge and
>>presentation abilities. We have however, identified a candidate that
>>has more practical experience, and are going to pursue him." Before that
>>it was something along the lines of "we feel you are
>>technically sound for a level 2 position but you have no practical
>>experience in large networks so we cannot go forward with you" And so it
>>has been for pretty much all of the in-person and phone
>>interviews that I've had.
>>I'm not even concerned about pay rate as job satisfaction is much more
>>important to me. Being a great network engineer is my long-term goal but
>>it's impossible to be great without day-to-day experience. I find that's
>>what helps to solidify the theory and lab work and keeps what I've
>>learnt on the journey to CCIE from becoming ephemeral.
>>I'm willing to put in the time to learn and do more and I've proven that
>>I'm technically capable but it seems that even with the CCIE, getting a
>>foot in the door is not that easy. Maybe it's because I live in NY and
>>there's a bit of a competition for junior level spots but I sure was
>>hoping that my cert would put me near the top half of a candidate list.
>>I know there are others on this list in the same plight that I'm in so
>>as a word of encouragement to myself and those, "hang in there,
>>somewhere, someone, is willing to give you a chance".
>>I'm still searching... Vijay Ramcharan, CCIE #14824, CCDP, MCSE
>>P.S. I'm currently employed and have been at the same employer for almost
>>5
>>years now. I don't do much day-to-day networking duties nor is there any
>>future opportunity for that here or I'd be glad to stay.
>>_______________________________________________________________________
>>Subscription information may be found at:
>>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
> I think a big part of the problem is the New York location. I have
> noticed that there are not that many advertised positions (on the major
> jobs sites) in the New York area for Cisco people. A reseller out on Long
> Island wants a CCIE, but they want someone who can also do penetration
> testing and other security tasks, and they have had the job open forever.
> They can't be trying to build a case for an H1B visa employee, because
> those have been filled for next year, too, I ahve read.
> Check out the DC metro area. There are many positions, and even if most
> require a lot of experience to go with the CCIE, you are likely to find
> something good where they can use you as a member of a team and not
> require that you know absolutely everything about everything. The DC
> government (local) spends a lot of money on IT and likes people with
> CCIEs. Perhaps the combination of the CCIE and whatever you do in your
> current job might be attractive to them. The feds have lots of work, too,
> but a lot of it requires a security clearance, and you do not even want
> to read a thread about the Catch 22 situation with security clearances.
> As for the thread you referred to, that business of some technical people
> trying to knock others down by finding their weak spots, that is just a
> fact of life. Some people have lots of years on the job, and many
> practical skills, but will never get the cert you got, and they may well
> resent the idea that some employer might view you as somehow better than
> them, and the opposite happened to that guy in the thread you referred to.
> It looks like the freshly minted CCIE was trying to put the fellow with so
> much experience.
>
> At the risk of sounding like Rodney King, I think we should all just get
> along, and help each other, and learn from each other. I have a good
> friend who has much more on-the-ground experinece than me, but he
> appreciates my input and analysis.
> I know the competition can be deadly in places where there have been
> layoffs, but if it is a healthy company, people should be collegial and
> supportive.
>
> Tom Larus, CCIE #10,014
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Oct 02 2005 - 14:40:15 GMT-3