Re: Does the default-router command provide redundancy?

From: Héctor Fernández (gnakh@telefonica.net)
Date: Wed Aug 24 2005 - 18:54:48 GMT-3


Hi,

I think behavior of an IP maching having two default gateways depends on its
implementation.
I wouldn't load two default gateways to a PC... Instead, Brant hit the
point... serve one gateway and look for whatever mechanism to make that
gateway redundant, like HSRP, GLBP, VRRP, etc...

Take care

Hictor

----- Original Message -----
From: "Brant I. Stevens" <branto@branto.com>
To: <rudi@dataconsult.com.lb>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 11:32 PM
Subject: Re: Does the default-router command provide redundancy?

> It looks like it is part of the IOS DHCP server scope/pool configuration.
> This is the DHCP client's default gateway, usually serviced by an HSRP
> virtual address.
>
>
>
> On 8/24/05 10:09 AM, "rudi@dataconsult.com.lb" <rudi@dataconsult.com.lb>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > Does the default-router command provide redundancy?
> > As posted on the Doc:
> >
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios123/123cgcr/ipras_
> > r/ip1_d1g.htm#wp1078499
> > There is no clear indication whether this command provides redundancy
(ie, if
> > Gateway 1 fails, Gateway 2 takes over dynamically).
> > Then my question is:
> > What is the use of several arguments in this command?
> > Hope i was clear.
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Sep 04 2005 - 17:01:20 GMT-3