From: gladston@br.ibm.com
Date: Wed Aug 24 2005 - 12:29:35 GMT-3
I thought that routing protocol packets received higher precedence by default.
But tests shows they don't.
I think I misundertood the following statement, and IOS sets precedence back to 0 before sending the packet out the interface.
Just internally the packet would receive higher precedence.
==========
Cisco IOS assigns an IP precedence of 6 to routing protocol packets on the control plane
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/rtgupdates.html
==========
Any feedback appreciated.
Rack2R6#clear ip os pro
Rack2R2#sh int e 0/0.26 pr
Ethernet0/0.26
Input
Precedence 0: 8215 packets, 539652 bytes
Precedence 6: 3 packets, 126 bytes
Feb 28 23:44:06: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Process 1, Nbr 6.6.6.6 on Ethernet0/0.26 from LOADING to FULL, Loading Done
Ethernet0/0.26
Input
Precedence 0: 8290 packets, 545670 bytes
Precedence 6: 3 packets, 126 bytes
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Sep 04 2005 - 17:01:20 GMT-3