Re: Eigrp Question

From: Noel Thompson (001155d@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Aug 10 2005 - 19:52:33 GMT-3


Yip i Did, Thanks for that.

I had authentication on. I removed it and my adj came up okay, with
eigrp stub on.

It could possibly be a typo with the keys.

Thanks

Noel

On 8/11/05, ccie2be <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com> wrote:
> Noel,
>
> Are you saying that the adj goes away and doesn't come back - ever?
>
> Do you have access to the router on the remote side of the atm link? If so,
> does the remote router also show the adjacency as being down?
>
> I'm not 100% positive but I believe that a stub eigrp router should show
> itself being adjacent with other directly connected eigrp routers.
>
> Also, did you config atm so that broadcasts are forwarded? Remember, eigrp
> uses mcast to form an adj. When you configured eigrp without using the stub
> feature, are you sure the adj didn't flap?
>
> Just a couple of thoughts.
>
> HTH, Tim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Noel
> Thompson
> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 5:58 PM
> To: Cisco certification
> Subject: Eigrp Question
>
> Hallo group,
>
> Eigrp forms an adjac over a ATM link okay. Acouple or routes are
> redistributed on on end with a summary address. No worries.
> As soon as i put the command Eigrp stub summary my adja goes away.
> Is this normal?
>
> Any suggestions.
>
> Thanks
>
> Noel
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Sep 04 2005 - 17:01:19 GMT-3