From: Schulz, Dave (DSchulz@dpsciences.com)
Date: Sun Aug 07 2005 - 20:50:30 GMT-3
san -
I believe that the first example applies it to the entire interface, where the
second example applies it to the DLCI, depending on what you are trying to
achieve. Though, I would like to see what some of the others comment on this
subject.
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com
To: lab
Sent: 8/7/2005 4:16 PM
Subject: Frame-Relay QOS basic question
Hi all,
I see there are two methods of configuring QOS on FR physical
interface, if there is only one active DLCI.
Question 1:
---------------
Lets assume serial 0/0 has only one DLCI, which one of the following
config is better ?
Config sample 1:
----------------------
inter serial 0/0
frame-relay traffi-shapping
frame-relay class DLCI_204
or
config sample 2:
----------------------
inter seria 0/0
frame-relay traffic-shapping
frame-relay interface-dlci 204
class DLCI_204
map-class
--------------
map-class frame-relay DLCI_204
frame-relay cir 512000
frame-relay bc 5120
frame-relay be 0
frame-relay fragment 640
I see IE book uses, mostly config sample 1. Is there a drawback or
a problem if used sample 2 ?
Question 2:
---------------
Multiple Match statments on a route-map...?
When used, does it treat as "match all" or match-any ?
Thanks in Advance
/SAN
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Sep 04 2005 - 17:01:18 GMT-3