From: James Matrisciano (jmatrisciano@kenttech.com)
Date: Thu Aug 04 2005 - 07:03:21 GMT-3
Lets not for get about LLQ. All LLQ really is is CBWFQ in a MQC design
using the priority command. I would go as far as to say that MQC is the
house, the foundation upon which a QoS model is built. What you put in
that house, be it, CBWFQ, LLQ, or how ever you want to set up a policing
agent, it all sits inside of MQC.
There is no real other way to do LLQ and CBWFQ without the MQC model.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Scott Morris
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 5:57 AM
To: buesink@fma.nl; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: CBWFQ without MQC is this possible
As far as I have seen, CBWFQ and MQC are interchangeable acronyms that
have developed over the years for the same process and command sets.
So they are one and the same. In effect, you are asking if you can use
IP without using IP. :)
HTH,
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
buesink@fma.nl
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 5:13 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: CBWFQ without MQC is this possible
Hi Guys..
Is is possible to do CBWFQ without the MQC..
The MQC method with class-maps I understand, but can I do it another
way.
If yes could somebody provide me with a short example?
Kind regards!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Sep 04 2005 - 17:01:18 GMT-3