From: Shanky (shankyz@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Aug 03 2005 - 07:58:13 GMT-3
Hi Dave,
IMHO it should be required to disable the inverse-arp on Phy I/Fs as all
unused DLCIs will get assigned to the Phy. I/F with an addr of
0.0.0.0<http://0.0.0.0>,
to avoid it we will have to disable inverse-arp on the Phy I/F.
Shanky
On 8/3/05, Schulz, Dave <DSchulz@dpsciences.com> wrote:
>
> Brian -
>
> It appears that the last examples have Inarp active, but I must be missing
> something. There is not a "no frame inverse" command on those two. Also,
> if
> you are using subinterfaces and the question wants you to not learn any
> unused
> DLCIs, then is it enough to use the "no frame inverse" on only the
> subinterfaces? Or, should you insure that you have it on the main
> interface
> also?
>
> Dave
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> To: Thomwin Chen; Desmond Ong; lab
> Sent: 8/3/2005 12:15 AM
> Subject: RE: frame-relay inverse arp
>
> Thomwin,
> You do not need to disable inverse-ARP on the physical
> interfaces if you are using only subinterfaces. This is because the "no
> frame-relay inverse-arp" command is not inherited by subinterfaces.
>
> Here are some examples of when inverse-ARP is enabled or disable
> based on the configuration itself or based on the use of the "no
> frame-relay inverse-arp" command.
>
> **********************************
> *** InARP Enabled for DLCI 102 ***
> **********************************
> interface Serial0/0
> no ip address
> encapsulation frame-relay
> !
> interface Serial0/0.1 multipoint
> ip address 10.1.1.1 <http://10.1.1.1> 255.255.255.0 <http://255.255.255.0>
> frame-relay interface-dlci 102
>
> **********************************
> *** InARP Enabled for DLCI 102 ***
> **********************************
> interface Serial0/0
> no ip address
> encapsulation frame-relay
> no frame-relay inverse-arp
> !
> interface Serial0/0.1 multipoint
> ip address 10.1.1.1 <http://10.1.1.1> 255.255.255.0 <http://255.255.255.0>
> frame-relay interface-dlci 102
>
> ***********************************
> *** InARP Disabled for DLCI 102 ***
> ***********************************
>
> interface Serial0/0
> no ip address
> encapsulation frame-relay
> !
> interface Serial0/0.1 multipoint
> ip address 10.1.1.1 <http://10.1.1.1> 255.255.255.0 <http://255.255.255.0>
> frame-relay interface-dlci 102
> no frame-relay inverse-arp
>
> *****************************************
> *** InARP Disabled for IP on DLCI 102 ***
> *****************************************
> interface Serial0/0
> no ip address
> encapsulation frame-relay
> !
> interface Serial0/0.1 multipoint
> ip address 10.1.1.1 <http://10.1.1.1> 255.255.255.0 <http://255.255.255.0>
> frame-relay interface-dlci 102
> no frame-relay inverse-arp IP 102
>
> *****************************************
> *** InARP Disabled for IP on DLCI 102 ***
> *****************************************
> interface Serial0/0
> no ip address
> encapsulation frame-relay
> !
> interface Serial0/0.1 multipoint
> ip address 10.1.1.1 <http://10.1.1.1> 255.255.255.0 <http://255.255.255.0>
> frame-relay map ip 10.1.1.1 <http://10.1.1.1> 102 broadcast
>
> ***********************************
> *** InARP Disabled for DLCI 102 ***
> ***********************************
> interface Serial0/0
> no ip address
> encapsulation frame-relay
> !
> interface Serial0/0.1 point-to-point
> ip address 10.1.1.1 <http://10.1.1.1> 255.255.255.0 <http://255.255.255.0>
> frame-relay interface-dlci 102
>
>
> Also it's a myth (aka urban legend ;-) that the "no arp
> frame-relay" command stops the replies to inverse-ARP. It doesn't.
>
> HTH,
>
> Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
> bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
>
> Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> Toll Free: 877-224-8987
> Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Thomwin Chen
> Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 8:45 PM
> To: Desmond Ong; 'lab'
> Subject: Re: frame-relay inverse arp
>
> Hi Desmond,
>
> you can test it by using a simple command :
> debug frame-relay packet and see why most workbooks suggest no
> frame-relay inverse-arp configured on physical FR interface.
>
> probably, you will also need this to know : no arp frame-relay
>
> Rgds,
> Thomwin
>
> Desmond Ong <desmond.gk@netstarnetworks.com> wrote:
> hi there,
>
> anyone can enlighten me on the following?
>
> when to use "no frame-relay inverse arp" and when to specifically use
> "no
> frame-relay inverse arp ip " ???
>
> Thanks!
>
> Regards,
> Des
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Sep 04 2005 - 17:01:18 GMT-3