Re: Are we required to ping local FR interface ?

From: Hoogen (hoogen82@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Jul 26 2005 - 04:06:19 GMT-3

• Next message: Thomwin Chen: "Re: Are we required to ping local FR interface ?"
• Previous message: asadovnikov: "RE: It's over!!!!"
• Maybe in reply to: Mark Atis: "Are we required to ping local FR interface ?"
• Next in thread: Thomwin Chen: "Re: Are we required to ping local FR interface ?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Read the question first. Make your judgement on what is asked. Clarify
with the proctor. Sometimes it is not required to ping the local
interface, sometimes it is.

Regards
Hoogen

On 7/25/05, Mark Atis <yesar1@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> What are your thoughts on the requirement to ping the
> local FR interface ?
>
> ie if I have the following config
>
> int s0
> encap frame
> ip add 10.10.1.1 255.255.255.0
> frame map ip 10.10.1.2 102 broadcasr
> frame map ip 10.10.1.1 102
>
>
> Do I need to configure the last statement to meet the
> exam requirement of pinging any-to-any
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________
> Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
> http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

• Next message: Thomwin Chen: "Re: Are we required to ping local FR interface ?"
• Previous message: asadovnikov: "RE: It's over!!!!"
• Maybe in reply to: Mark Atis: "Are we required to ping local FR interface ?"
• Next in thread: Thomwin Chen: "Re: Are we required to ping local FR interface ?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Sep 04 2005 - 17:00:31 GMT-3