From: Chris Lewis \(chrlewis\) (chrlewis@cisco.com)
Date: Sat Jun 25 2005 - 21:21:21 GMT-3
Take off any map-class configurations, add a bandwidth statement in to
an interface then run auto qos voip, it is a macro that ads all the
class maps and so forth in to your configuration. If you want to
simplify your life regarding identifying all the port number for voice
signaling, it is worth getting familiar with the operation of this
command.
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: John Matus [mailto:jmatus@pacbell.net]
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 5:28 PM
To: Chris Lewis (chrlewis); lab
Subject: Re: classification of voice traffic
"auto qos"?? never heard of this......can you show a brief config
example?
Regards,
John D. Matus
MCSE, CCNP
Office: 818-782-2061
Cell: 818-430-8372
jmatus@pacbell.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Lewis (chrlewis)" <chrlewis@cisco.com>
To: "John Matus" <jmatus@pacbell.net>; "lab" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 3:23 PM
Subject: RE: classification of voice traffic
A good trick for the lab is to get used to using auto qos, it creates
all the class maps to identify all voice traffic, so get used to running
auto qos, noting what class maps are created, then running no auto qos
to take it out of the configuration and you can use the parts you want.
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
John Matus
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 4:40 PM
To: lab
Subject: classification of voice traffic
there seems to be many different ways to classify and filter voice
traffic that i've seen, via rtp, rsvp, and h.323 signaling...
is there any one filter method that will filter all type of voice
traffic?
if you filter the following:
class-map match-all voice
match access-group 101
access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq 1720 access-list 101 permit udp
any any range 16384 32767
are you essentially matching all voice traffic?
how does that differ from:
class-map match-all voice
match pro rtp
i believe that rtp range is the same for udp ports, so is the only
difference in the two examples the signaling with the tcp statement?
Regards,
John D. Matus
MCSE, CCNP
Office: 818-782-2061
Cell: 818-430-8372
jmatus@pacbell.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jul 06 2005 - 14:43:44 GMT-3