From: Chris Lewis \(chrlewis\) (chrlewis@cisco.com)
Date: Sat Jun 25 2005 - 21:18:08 GMT-3
This method just gives you all the match cases you need in the
class-maps, so you don't have to remember the port numbers for H.323,
skinny etc. it is up to you how you allocate bandwidth as part of a
policy map after that.
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: John Matus [mailto:jmatus@pacbell.net]
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 5:32 PM
To: Chris Lewis (chrlewis); lab
Subject: Re: classification of voice traffic
i looked @ the command and it looks nasty. i don't specifically see a
methos by where you could configure voice traffic to alot 128K of
bandwitdh out an interface with this method..............or can you???
Regards,
John D. Matus
MCSE, CCNP
Office: 818-782-2061
Cell: 818-430-8372
jmatus@pacbell.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Lewis (chrlewis)" <chrlewis@cisco.com>
To: "John Matus" <jmatus@pacbell.net>; "lab" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 3:23 PM
Subject: RE: classification of voice traffic
A good trick for the lab is to get used to using auto qos, it creates
all the class maps to identify all voice traffic, so get used to running
auto qos, noting what class maps are created, then running no auto qos
to take it out of the configuration and you can use the parts you want.
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
John Matus
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 4:40 PM
To: lab
Subject: classification of voice traffic
there seems to be many different ways to classify and filter voice
traffic that i've seen, via rtp, rsvp, and h.323 signaling...
is there any one filter method that will filter all type of voice
traffic?
if you filter the following:
class-map match-all voice
match access-group 101
access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq 1720 access-list 101 permit udp
any any range 16384 32767
are you essentially matching all voice traffic?
how does that differ from:
class-map match-all voice
match pro rtp
i believe that rtp range is the same for udp ports, so is the only
difference in the two examples the signaling with the tcp statement?
Regards,
John D. Matus
MCSE, CCNP
Office: 818-782-2061
Cell: 818-430-8372
jmatus@pacbell.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jul 06 2005 - 14:43:44 GMT-3